Breaking News
News & Analysis

Making every TV 'smart'

8/28/2012 05:30 PM EDT
8 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
MindTech
User Rank
Manager
re: Making every TV 'smart'
MindTech   8/30/2012 8:34:38 PM
NO RATINGS
Even this is a half measure. Sure, the remote is now a simplified WiiMote, but how does that help deal with the fact that I've got 5 of the damn things on my side table. To make devices smart we need a standard protocol for devices to expose their interfaces and functions to other smart devices, including each other. As for protocol, I'd hope that Bluetooth (already available in all smart phones and tablets) would be the communication channel of choice. I want to be able to have my smart device talk to my TV and turn into a remote. Then have the TV talk to my BluRay player, game system, and speaker amp, so when I send change input (or change activity) commands the whole system responds: TV changes input, devices turn on or off, volumes auto-adjust and sound profiles change, and the remote interfaces (buttons, sliders, menus, etc) change to represent the new activity. Oh, and make the whole thing open please. I'd call it the Bluetooth Open Remote Blueprint or BlueORB(tm).

selinz
User Rank
CEO
re: Making every TV 'smart'
selinz   8/30/2012 12:23:23 AM
NO RATINGS
Well, it seems as though Samsung is using the term the most. Whilst I don't have a TV of theirs, I do have a BR player. They have internet, apps for all the video services (like neflix and hulu), apps for games, the ability to stream in audio, video, and pics from a different pc (Windows media player), games (apps), and of course wireless. Youtube and facebook, of course. Basically it's a poor mans computer. So for $89 at fry's, you get a wireless blue ray player than can do a bunch of junk. And you can use their remote or download an Android app. This effectively turns my dumb and old vizio plasma monitor into a smart TV. A computer would essentially do the same thing, but for more money... I'd say that's pretty smart.

asdffffffff
User Rank
Rookie
re: Making every TV 'smart'
asdffffffff   8/29/2012 4:27:48 PM
NO RATINGS
Cheap Kinect-like systems is clearly the direction. Anyone have a thought about time frame and costs? In 2 years and under $100?

chanj0
User Rank
CEO
re: Making every TV 'smart'
chanj0   8/29/2012 3:51:29 PM
NO RATINGS
Bert22306 made a very good point. Smart TV isn't just defined by man-machine interface. It is defined by the convergence of Internet and TV. I always say a Smart TV is a Connected TV simply because it doesn't think and it doesn't choose channel for you. You, holding on the remote control, still have ultimate choice. Nonetheless, who knows when a real smart TV will come. It might be next year given the pace of technology advancement. What are the important features that you will call a TV smart?

prabhakar_deosthali
User Rank
CEO
re: Making every TV 'smart'
prabhakar_deosthali   8/29/2012 9:19:42 AM
NO RATINGS
Instead of calling it a smart TV we should actually call it a smart remote. The TV remains as passive as it was with the dumb remote.

DrQuine
User Rank
CEO
re: Making every TV 'smart'
DrQuine   8/29/2012 2:28:11 AM
NO RATINGS
I love technology as much as the next engineer but I must admit that I had a fondness for my old TV that never crashed or locked up. Just about every other device in the house has a repair diagnostic sequence that starts with "shutdown and reboot". Our TV that just works is being replaced with more features ... including crashing from time to time. Our new TV started life with a HDMI problem upon installation that required a new motherboard be installed. I'd rather have the smart technology in the TiVo and leave the TV as a passive display device. Not all technology is progress.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
re: Making every TV 'smart'
Bert22306   8/28/2012 9:50:53 PM
NO RATINGS
Define "smart TV." All it takes to qualify is that an on-screen cursor is used to navigate menus? But I have many dumb components that use this type of user interface. Even my first DVD player. You couldn't just aim the remote, but you definitely moved the on-screen cursor with the arrow buttons. I think a "smart TV" needs to be connected to the Internet and it should also *not* be constrained to just a couple of web sites. I don't see how a remote alone can do that. Because I couldn't find anything on the market that qualified as "smart TV" in my book, I ended up dedicating a PC to the job. Connected to the TV via RGB and stereo audio (or I could have bought an HDMI adapter card for the PC, for both audio and video interface), and using a wireless remote keyboard and mouse, now I got what I'd consider a "smart TV." Using the same criterion as one would for, say, a "smart phone." I'm not saying the smarter remote isn't cool, however I am saying that IMO it takes more than a remote to make a smart TV.

R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Blogger
re: Making every TV 'smart'
R_Colin_Johnson   8/28/2012 7:06:08 PM
NO RATINGS
Just as every cell phone is becoming smarter, TV manufacturers too are aspiring to make all they models smart. Smart TVs don't all have the same capabilities, but one element that is becoming essential is the ability to aim the remote at menu items in a point-and-click user interface. Usually that means burdening the application processor in the TV with interpreting the MEMS sensor data from an accelerometer or gyroscope, but by putting those smarts inside the remote itself, TV manufacturers should be able to upgrade more of their low-end models to Smart TV status.

Most Recent Comments
Wnderer
 
David Ashton
 
mikehibbett
 
dwhess
 
David Ashton
 
LarryM99
 
David Ashton
 
mikehibbett
 
goafrit
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
How to Cope with a Burpy Comet
October 17, 2pm EDT Friday
EE Times Editorial Director Karen Field interviews Andrea Accomazzo, Flight Director for the Rosetta Spacecraft.
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed