Breaking News
News & Analysis

IBM, ST go back to the future with nanorelay logic

9/4/2012 01:05 PM EDT
13 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Jayna Sheats
User Rank
Manager
re: IBM, ST go back to the future with nanorelay logic
Jayna Sheats   9/4/2012 4:39:39 PM
NO RATINGS
Work on this topic has been going on at UC Berkeley for several years and they are making small scale demonstrators now. How does the European academic background work compare?

Wilton.Helm
User Rank
Rookie
re: IBM, ST go back to the future with nanorelay logic
Wilton.Helm   9/4/2012 9:49:45 PM
NO RATINGS
One possible advantage would be that this takes us back to the polarity insensitive and bidirictional current flow inherent in a relay. Back when logic was routinely made from relays, those attributes were routinely taken advantage of to create systems that weren't strictly boolean in nature. The result was fewer relays (and lower power consumption).

csmaurojr
User Rank
Rookie
re: IBM, ST go back to the future with nanorelay logic
csmaurojr   9/4/2012 10:17:46 PM
NO RATINGS
You must be joking... THIS is where we're headed? Somehow, I doubt that Intel and others are too worried about the potential competition. Still, it does cause one pause, and in thinking about it, I can see all sorts of low-end applications that beg for as close to zero power if were possible to achieve. This may help.

PaDesigner
User Rank
Rookie
re: IBM, ST go back to the future with nanorelay logic
PaDesigner   9/4/2012 10:31:23 PM
NO RATINGS
Swedish inst. and few others have related works on this.

vipul982
User Rank
Rookie
re: IBM, ST go back to the future with nanorelay logic
vipul982   9/5/2012 3:52:08 AM
NO RATINGS
I can't imagine we are headed towards these type of technologies. I doubt that using mechanical compponents would create a hell of noise in circuits, lot of research must be done.

TFCSD
User Rank
CEO
re: IBM, ST go back to the future with nanorelay logic
TFCSD   9/5/2012 4:08:11 AM
NO RATINGS
Cool, I use to work on IBM wire logic relays on their unit record machines in the 80's. Just give me a small enough contact file and lots of contact cleaner.

rf_austin
User Rank
Rookie
re: IBM, ST go back to the future with nanorelay logic
rf_austin   9/5/2012 3:30:25 PM
NO RATINGS
No matter how small you make a mems switch, the switching speed is still in kHz or at best barely reaching MHz. Although it is small, there is still inertia associated with the metal that is being moved. For those applications that are okay with kHz clock rates but almost no power consumption and extraordinarily radiation hard, this could be what you are waiting for.

icdsn
User Rank
Rookie
re: IBM, ST go back to the future with nanorelay logic
icdsn   9/5/2012 3:33:23 PM
NO RATINGS
3x3um cell size, logic will be $$$

Jayna Sheats
User Rank
Manager
re: IBM, ST go back to the future with nanorelay logic
Jayna Sheats   9/5/2012 5:20:18 PM
NO RATINGS
This is actually not true; the UC Berkeley group has already demonstrated ns response times and sub-micron features. The technology promises to scale well. The issues are really system-level: device advantages often get lost when the constraints of an entire system are considered.

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
re: IBM, ST go back to the future with nanorelay logic
Peter Clarke   9/5/2012 5:28:40 PM
NO RATINGS
Dont forget that Cavendish Kinetics and others have been working on memories based on this approach for years.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Most Recent Comments
Tech on line balaji
 
seaEE
 
Duane Benson
 
MeasurementBlues
 
rick merritt
 
rick merritt
 
rick merritt
 
Garcia-Lasheras
 
Garcia-Lasheras
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
EE Times Senior Technical Editor Martin Rowe will interview EMC engineer Kenneth Wyatt.
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll