Breaking News
News & Analysis

IBM, ST go back to the future with nanorelay logic

9/4/2012 01:05 PM EDT
13 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
csmaurojr
User Rank
Rookie
re: IBM, ST go back to the future with nanorelay logic
csmaurojr   9/4/2012 10:17:46 PM
NO RATINGS
You must be joking... THIS is where we're headed? Somehow, I doubt that Intel and others are too worried about the potential competition. Still, it does cause one pause, and in thinking about it, I can see all sorts of low-end applications that beg for as close to zero power if were possible to achieve. This may help.

Wilton.Helm
User Rank
Rookie
re: IBM, ST go back to the future with nanorelay logic
Wilton.Helm   9/4/2012 9:49:45 PM
NO RATINGS
One possible advantage would be that this takes us back to the polarity insensitive and bidirictional current flow inherent in a relay. Back when logic was routinely made from relays, those attributes were routinely taken advantage of to create systems that weren't strictly boolean in nature. The result was fewer relays (and lower power consumption).

Jayna Sheats
User Rank
Manager
re: IBM, ST go back to the future with nanorelay logic
Jayna Sheats   9/4/2012 4:39:39 PM
NO RATINGS
Work on this topic has been going on at UC Berkeley for several years and they are making small scale demonstrators now. How does the European academic background work compare?

<<   <   Page 2 / 2
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
EE Times editor Junko Yoshida grills two executives --Rick Walker, senior product marketing manager for IoT and home automation for CSR, and Jim Reich, CTO and co-founder at Palatehome.
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed