Breaking News
News & Analysis

Buyout scheme said to include Freescale deal

10/11/2012 02:00 PM EDT
6 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
JoePLUS
User Rank
Rookie
re: Buyout scheme said to include Freescale deal
JoePLUS   10/18/2012 11:03:03 PM
NO RATINGS
I would be willing to bet the write off is accounting 'magic' or an attempt to derail the investigation. The private equity almost always get their pound of flesh and leave the 'surviving' company they spin out drowning in debt. Their normal MO is buy low, sell anything of value and slash expenditures by closing facilities they can't liquidate quickly while collecting huge 'management fees' to extract capital. With the 'new and improved' balance sheet, the company borrows money to make their 'investor' whole and finally have a new IPO or sell to a lower class of private equity vampires. Research the destruction of Simmons, the largest bedding company in the US. This is the case study for how a series of 7 private equity deals decimated a company. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/05/business/economy/05simmons.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

Semiguru
User Rank
Rookie
re: Buyout scheme said to include Freescale deal
Semiguru   10/13/2012 2:36:50 AM
NO RATINGS
30 years hard labor for all Blackstone Group, KKR & Co., Bain Capital Partners, Carlyle Group excecutives and their lawyers at once. They are the leaders behind the demise of the USA and the manufacturing industry here.

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
re: Buyout scheme said to include Freescale deal
Peter Clarke   10/12/2012 2:29:30 PM
NO RATINGS
@eewiz I am no lawyer but I understand that a non-compete deal or cartel formation is considered illegal under U.S. antitrust law. But it does remain the case that the private equity companies' bad timing for investing in 2006 and writing off in 2009 is probably their best defense, and may get them off the hook. The case against would argue that the various leveraged buy deals were worth more than the amount paid IN 2006 and that the PE companies would have paid more but for the alleged collusion. In other words the case against would argue that the PE companies are guilty AND incompetent.

eewiz
User Rank
CEO
re: Buyout scheme said to include Freescale deal
eewiz   10/12/2012 3:24:24 AM
NO RATINGS
Well, after paying 17.6B for freescale and 8B for NXP and writing of most of the investment, they would definitely want to consider a non compete arrangement

goafrit
User Rank
Manager
re: Buyout scheme said to include Freescale deal
goafrit   10/11/2012 11:47:04 PM
NO RATINGS
It is the sign that greed must be regulated. Man cannot control himself in the quest for money.

bizzkid28
User Rank
Rookie
re: Buyout scheme said to include Freescale deal
bizzkid28   10/11/2012 7:44:23 PM
NO RATINGS
So when is the trial? They have been on this hunt for years and convicting for far less in the past year, just look what has happened http://www.crunchbase.com/person/rajat-gupta-4

Navigate to Related Links
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.