Breaking News
News & Analysis

ST denies break up rumor

10/12/2012 01:25 PM EDT
6 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Threaded | Newest First | Oldest First
krisi
User Rank
Author
re: ST denies break up rumor
krisi   10/12/2012 2:34:08 PM
NO RATINGS
Such a move would make a lot of sense...their digital business has low probability of survival on its own

goafrit
User Rank
Author
re: ST denies break up rumor
goafrit   10/14/2012 1:20:54 PM
NO RATINGS
But even the analog/mixed signal has been doing well because of Apple. If Apple departs, they could be in trouble.

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Author
re: ST denies break up rumor
Peter Clarke   10/12/2012 2:45:45 PM
NO RATINGS
It is also interesting that ST's denial is carefully worded. It has denied the "existence of initiatives" but it has not mentioned whether creating such initiatives is being discussed.

Python0
User Rank
Author
re: ST denies break up rumor
Python0   10/13/2012 9:03:07 AM
NO RATINGS
After the acquisition of NXP wireless and Ericsson mobile units, they do no know how to manage them. It shall be interesting to see if Samsung is interested to buy this money losing unit, some additional cuts will occur.

goafrit
User Rank
Author
re: ST denies break up rumor
goafrit   10/14/2012 2:57:30 PM
NO RATINGS
Digital is a losing business. I wonder if anyone will be ready to help them by buying it

FraAmelia
User Rank
Author
re: ST denies break up rumor
FraAmelia   10/15/2012 7:56:55 AM
NO RATINGS
In my opinion it's time for ST to come back to the original company mission: technology innovation. I do not see any vision in Bozzoti's speeches. The management is playing with creative finance: breakups and carve outs. Time is up: next wrong step and ST will follow Nokia in its decline.

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed