Breaking News
News & Analysis

Microprocessor server benchmarks seen as irrelevant

10/31/2012 09:58 PM EDT
2 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Nenik0
User Rank
Rookie
re: Microprocessor server benchmarks seen as irrelevant
Nenik0   11/12/2012 8:04:24 AM
NO RATINGS
Hmm, SPECpower is a benchmark, and is 2008. But perhaps it is no longer relevant what is the power usage of a synthetic benchmark when you know your exact workload upfront.

TarraTarra!
User Rank
CEO
re: Microprocessor server benchmarks seen as irrelevant
TarraTarra!   11/2/2012 6:35:00 AM
NO RATINGS
Benchmarks will always be used as long as CPUs are sold. The type of benchmarks will change and the traditional compute oriented benchmarks will be replaced with more system and IO throughput ones. There is a need for a suite of benchmarks that not only measure performance but also power. A spec-power for the new workloads - maybe a cloud-power benchmark suite that measures throughput in transactions/sec/watt. And can all the self-respecting CPU vendors stop quoting DMIPS?

Most Recent Comments
Wnderer
 
David Ashton
 
mikehibbett
 
dwhess
 
David Ashton
 
LarryM99
 
David Ashton
 
mikehibbett
 
goafrit
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
How to Cope with a Burpy Comet
October 17, 2pm EDT Friday
EE Times Editorial Director Karen Field interviews Andrea Accomazzo, Flight Director for the Rosetta Spacecraft.
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed