Breaking News
News & Analysis

Microprocessor server benchmarks seen as irrelevant

10/31/2012 09:58 PM EDT
2 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Threaded | Newest First | Oldest First
TarraTarra!
User Rank
CEO
re: Microprocessor server benchmarks seen as irrelevant
TarraTarra!   11/2/2012 6:35:00 AM
NO RATINGS
Benchmarks will always be used as long as CPUs are sold. The type of benchmarks will change and the traditional compute oriented benchmarks will be replaced with more system and IO throughput ones. There is a need for a suite of benchmarks that not only measure performance but also power. A spec-power for the new workloads - maybe a cloud-power benchmark suite that measures throughput in transactions/sec/watt. And can all the self-respecting CPU vendors stop quoting DMIPS?

Nenik0
User Rank
Rookie
re: Microprocessor server benchmarks seen as irrelevant
Nenik0   11/12/2012 8:04:24 AM
NO RATINGS
Hmm, SPECpower is a benchmark, and is 2008. But perhaps it is no longer relevant what is the power usage of a synthetic benchmark when you know your exact workload upfront.

Top Comments of the Week
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.
Flash Poll