Breaking News
News & Analysis

IBM backs Brazilian wafer fab project

11/20/2012 12:32 PM EST
6 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
dick_freebird
User Rank
Author
re: IBM backs Brazilian wafer fab project
dick_freebird   11/25/2012 2:21:28 AM
NO RATINGS
The rest of the world prefers not to buy military and space grade ICs from the US, due to our regulatory posture. They will look at any alternatives they can get. Anybody can do the job on quality, if they want. It only needs proving.

pinhead1
User Rank
Author
re: IBM backs Brazilian wafer fab project
pinhead1   11/21/2012 6:49:45 PM
NO RATINGS
TI build their "R-Fab" with used equipment, which could be a substantial cost savings. But I'm not sure how often you can find nearly a whole fabs-worth of used 300mm equipment. But I'll admit that I've never tried ;-)

jmrowca
User Rank
Author
re: IBM backs Brazilian wafer fab project
jmrowca   11/21/2012 3:54:21 PM
NO RATINGS
unsure if any military end users would want their IBM ICs coming from Brazil... interesting

geekmaster
User Rank
Author
re: IBM backs Brazilian wafer fab project
geekmaster   11/20/2012 10:58:25 PM
NO RATINGS
CEITEC in Porto Alegre is still not producing chips. They use mainly X-Fab. Absolutely unclear why they need another fab when they cannot get the one running they have already.

RobDinsmore
User Rank
Author
re: IBM backs Brazilian wafer fab project
RobDinsmore   11/20/2012 6:58:39 PM
NO RATINGS
Maybe they are planning to buy old, used equipment to start. Perhaps IBM's stake will be bought with old tools.

pinhead1
User Rank
Author
re: IBM backs Brazilian wafer fab project
pinhead1   11/20/2012 6:51:11 PM
NO RATINGS
Would this be a 300mm fab? It seems unlikely that you could build one from the ground up for "only" 500 million. But it seems equally strange that you'd want to build a brand-new 200mm fab these days.

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed