Breaking News
News & Analysis

IBM details 3-D server chip stacks

12/12/2012 05:01 AM EST
4 comments
NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 2 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Rchandta1
User Rank
Rookie
re: IBM details 3-D server chip stacks
Rchandta1   12/14/2012 10:48:01 PM
NO RATINGS
Given low volume, 3D stacking using TSV makes perfect sense. Reduction in power consumption would be unparalleled. .. But what about thermal dissipation?

nano_meter
User Rank
Rookie
re: IBM details 3-D server chip stacks
nano_meter   12/12/2012 9:52:46 PM
NO RATINGS
IBM has been filling B323A in East Fishkill N.Y. for years with tooling for advanced nodes. It seems to have been their plan all along. They are running 22nm and 14nm development in pretty good volumes on the latest immersion tools. I don't understand the reference to " has not invested in a leading edge Fab" for quite some time , there is still room to expand in the current building, and as far as I know, they can support at least the next two nodes there.

chipmonk0
User Rank
CEO
re: IBM details 3-D server chip stacks
chipmonk0   12/12/2012 4:33:42 PM
NO RATINGS
For some time IBM has not invested in leading edge Fabs . So they have a reason to pursue TSV based 3D stacking, partitioning of functions ( SRAM, I/O etc. ). The thermal and stress issues of 3D stacking w/ TSVs are only beginning to be studied and both routing and performance would be affected by these factors. Integration at the Package level w/o compromising performance too much requires fine - pitch thin film interconnects and soon drilling holes ( TSVs ) in live Si. This is by no means cheap. By not building Fabs of the latest node IBM saves on Capital but their unit cost goes up because of expensive packaging. But they make large and expensive systems so additional part costs get buried. Companies that sell less than million units of high priced chips ( e,g. FPGA ) are next in line for integration at Package level. This is not the case for Consumer systems where the massive volume enables at least the leaders to build the latest Fabs and integrate everything ( as in a SoC ) on a single small chip. As some of the leading Fabless companies who have recently dabbled in 3D stacking etc. have found out, cost would be a big deterrent. So for them its back to the Intel single chip approach ( but built at offshore Foundries )

krisi
User Rank
CEO
re: IBM details 3-D server chip stacks
krisi   12/12/2012 3:59:53 PM
NO RATINGS
Did they discuss cooling challenges?

Most Recent Comments
eetcowie
 
eetcowie
 
David Ashton
 
eetcowie
 
David Ashton
 
eetcowie
 
eetcowie
 
eetcowie
 
eetcowie
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
How to Cope with a Burpy Comet
October 17, 2pm EDT Friday
EE Times Editorial Director Karen Field interviews Andrea Accomazzo, Flight Director for the Rosetta Spacecraft.
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed