Design Con 2015
Breaking News
News & Analysis

Slideshow: IBM outlines fab future beyond FinFETs

2/12/2013 02:45 PM EST
28 comments
NO RATINGS
1 saves
Page 1 / 6 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>
HS_SemiPro
User Rank
CEO
re: Slideshow: IBM outlines fab future beyond FinFETs
HS_SemiPro   2/14/2013 4:38:58 AM
NO RATINGS
I have seen both Gate 1st and gate last processes, what really matters is whether each tech can provide the published specs with reasonable yield, in time for customer shipment. Non-Intel fabs have had a hard time delivering Yield on time in HKMG ,primarily coz,it was their 1st time producing it in 32/28nm. Intel was already playing with it since 65nm days.,

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Slideshow: IBM outlines fab future beyond FinFETs
resistion   2/14/2013 1:57:22 AM
NO RATINGS
Thought after FinFET, the common thinking was GAA or TFET. Even heard talk of junctionless.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Slideshow: IBM outlines fab future beyond FinFETs
resistion   2/14/2013 1:41:57 AM
NO RATINGS
What IBM calls "7 nm" is around 17-18 nm half-pitch, from the slide. About the same as NAND 1x today.

any1
User Rank
CEO
re: Slideshow: IBM outlines fab future beyond FinFETs
any1   2/13/2013 4:43:09 PM
NO RATINGS
It seems a bit early to be predicting what will happen at 7 nm, but if DSA continues to rapidly evolve then perhaps it can be a disruptive technology by then. If we are stuck with quad patterning I can't see it being cost effective.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Slideshow: IBM outlines fab future beyond FinFETs
resistion   2/13/2013 3:30:52 PM
NO RATINGS
An electron with 1.5 eV kinetic energy has 1 nm wavelength. If we keep on reducing voltages and dimensions we could have some quantum crossover, like at ~2 nm. If the dimensions are (already) less than the electron mean free path, then it gets really interesting.

de_la_rosa
User Rank
Rookie
re: Slideshow: IBM outlines fab future beyond FinFETs
de_la_rosa   2/13/2013 1:30:48 PM
NO RATINGS
no choice? ebeam wavelength @ 0.2 nm gives more choice.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Slideshow: IBM outlines fab future beyond FinFETs
resistion   2/13/2013 12:09:25 PM
NO RATINGS
This site gives a decent review: http://maltiel-consulting.com/Integrating_high-k_Metal_Gate_first_or_last_maltiel_semiconductor.html

nano_meter
User Rank
Rookie
re: Slideshow: IBM outlines fab future beyond FinFETs
nano_meter   2/13/2013 11:33:45 AM
NO RATINGS
HS seems to have an understanding of why IBM is still in semiconductors, mainly to support their systems business, and in that regard they are successful. It is a relatively small operation with one 200 mm and one 300 mm fab - running about 5 process nodes worth of tech under one roof v. Intel's many Fab high volume operation, why even make a comparison there ? Two different businesses. I am not a Phd like I imagine many of you commentators are, so can you please explain why you consider the gate first approach to be so inferior v. gate last ?

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Slideshow: IBM outlines fab future beyond FinFETs
resistion   2/13/2013 5:40:19 AM
NO RATINGS
Well Intel has been changing its HKMG process from 45 to 32 to 22. Probably too busy to laugh. Who knows maybe they'll come out with their own gate first approach.

HS_SemiPro
User Rank
CEO
re: Slideshow: IBM outlines fab future beyond FinFETs
HS_SemiPro   2/13/2013 5:39:27 AM
NO RATINGS
IBM Makes its money from Selling Enterprise Systems, that include full bundle including Software, Servers, data warehouse, and services. IBM Chip tech is developed for its server Chips and related SOCs, That gives them tech advantage over competition.

<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
EE Times Senior Technical Editor Martin Rowe will interview EMC engineer Kenneth Wyatt.
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll