Breaking News
News & Analysis

FinFET race holds promises, perils

3/27/2013 02:01 PM EDT
9 comments
NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 2 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: FinFET race holds promises, perils
rick merritt   3/27/2013 2:41:35 PM
NO RATINGS
Please weigh in if you are helping pave (or hoping to walk) the road to 14nm FinFETs.

ChipperGuy
User Rank
Rookie
re: FinFET race holds promises, perils
ChipperGuy   3/27/2013 6:15:33 PM
NO RATINGS
Hi Rick, That chart shows a 66% increase in capacitance not 40%...

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: FinFET race holds promises, perils
rick merritt   3/27/2013 8:57:13 PM
NO RATINGS
Fixed, thanks

tsmcGF-BS
User Rank
Rookie
re: FinFET race holds promises, perils
tsmcGF-BS   3/27/2013 9:19:22 PM
NO RATINGS
40% or 66 % higher capacitance "equal to 130nm "and little supple voltage scaling ! Thus Power can not be lower based on physics Power being proportional to C and V*V . I am loosing all respect for TSMC and GF marketing. Rick or anyone else any comment?

tsmcGF-BS
User Rank
Rookie
re: FinFET race holds promises, perils
tsmcGF-BS   3/27/2013 9:25:02 PM
NO RATINGS
I guess I should add intel BS marketing as well. Paul O. CEO has been talking about a finfet and winning mobile for past 3 years. yet intel still not shipping mobile atoms using finfet. In fact Paul will be pushed out of intel before a singe cell phone or table chip ship with finfet ships. I hear uncompetitive 22nm finfet atoms too high power and shipping slipping to 2014 . I think Rick you found the problem. Capacitance is too high and finfets increase not lower power .

jrtolber
User Rank
Rookie
re: FinFET race holds promises, perils
jrtolber   3/29/2013 3:22:10 AM
NO RATINGS
Valid concerns with the increased capacitance, however that only points out a potential increase in dynamic power. Recently, leakage power has been of major concern in Deep Submicron Planar technologies. This power is consumed while the gates are not switching and historically have contributed much of the power. Perhaps finfets offer the benefit of reduced leakage power.....

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: FinFET race holds promises, perils
resistion   3/29/2013 3:51:36 AM
NO RATINGS
I compared Intel 32 nm vs 22 nm drive current density (I_on mA/um) - 22 nm looks worse at same leakage!

michigan0
User Rank
Manager
re: FinFET race holds promises, perils
michigan0   4/2/2013 2:32:47 AM
NO RATINGS
Anil Jain said “ FinFETs bring a 66 percent increase in gate capacitance per micron compared to today’s-28nm process, back up to the level of the 130-nm planar node”. I disagree. At the device level the transistor drive current is improved by high gate capacitance resulted from higher permittivity of the high-k dielectric. However, performance at high operating clock frequency can be negatively impacted by the increased gate capacitance. To minimize this penalty Intel uses the unique HK/MG (high K such as HfO2)/Metal electrode that give intrinsically superior electrostatic control or short channel effect and reduced stand-by power reducing gate current. Therefore, Intel’s HK/MG will provide high performance through higher gate capacitance and concurrently scale down the gate length of the transistor. That is why Intel’s 22nm FinFETs are in high volume manufacturing over a year, and the 14nm FinFETs will be manufactured in 2014. Recently, major foundries, TSMC, Samsung, and others announced to adopt FinFET technology at 14nm and manufacture in 2014, skipping the 22nm to catch up with Intel. However, the successful implementation of FinFET technology will be much easier at the 22nm than at the 14nm node because of the lack of process and manufacturing learning at the 22nm node, resulting in further behind Intel.

AKH0
User Rank
Freelancer
re: FinFET race holds promises, perils
AKH0   4/3/2013 11:27:09 PM
NO RATINGS
The "gate capacitance" is no longer just the inversion gate capacitance. In fact, inversion gate capacitance is just a small portion of the total transistor capacitance. FinFET has significantly higher parasitic capacitance than planar devices, and that's just one of the few reasons even Intel FinFET did not the 50% reduction of active power that was originally claimed.

August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.