Breaking News
News & Analysis

Intel names insider Brian Krzanich CEO

5/2/2013 02:00 PM EDT
31 comments
NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 2 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 7   >   >>
sranje
User Rank
Author
re: Intel names insider Brian Krzanich CEO
sranje   5/25/2013 11:39:17 PM
NO RATINGS
Krzanich and Intel will continue to do very well -- Croatians rock !!

sranje
User Rank
Author
re: Intel names insider Brian Krzanich CEO
sranje   5/25/2013 11:39:17 PM
NO RATINGS
Krzanich and Intel will continue to do very well -- Croatians rock !!

GroovyGeek
User Rank
Author
re: Intel names insider Brian Krzanich CEO
GroovyGeek   5/7/2013 6:12:21 PM
NO RATINGS
Barrett was an engineer with broad experience in operations. He was the guy that invented copy exactly and is personally responsible for Intel becoming the manufacturing powerhouse it currently is. However there is reason to argue that Barrett was the worst CEO in Intel's history. More than $20B blown on acquisitions, mostly in cash, at the top of the market, and mostly written off. I cannot think of a single company that has not been either sold at a substantial loss or shut down. Intel knows how to execute, this is not their problem, they are the best in the world at it. Intel needs something to execute on to diversify their business, and operations wizards typically do not excel in that department. Let's give BK the benefit of the doubt, he just does not seem to have the background. ONE patent, no active visibility in the industry outside Intel... Time will tell.

GroovyGeek
User Rank
Author
re: Intel names insider Brian Krzanich CEO
GroovyGeek   5/7/2013 6:12:21 PM
NO RATINGS
Barrett was an engineer with broad experience in operations. He was the guy that invented copy exactly and is personally responsible for Intel becoming the manufacturing powerhouse it currently is. However there is reason to argue that Barrett was the worst CEO in Intel's history. More than $20B blown on acquisitions, mostly in cash, at the top of the market, and mostly written off. I cannot think of a single company that has not been either sold at a substantial loss or shut down. Intel knows how to execute, this is not their problem, they are the best in the world at it. Intel needs something to execute on to diversify their business, and operations wizards typically do not excel in that department. Let's give BK the benefit of the doubt, he just does not seem to have the background. ONE patent, no active visibility in the industry outside Intel... Time will tell.

Chuck052
User Rank
Author
re: Intel names insider Brian Krzanich CEO
Chuck052   5/7/2013 2:36:22 PM
NO RATINGS
This is a perfect choice - an engineer with broad experience in operations. I would expect much clearer direction and commitment to execution than we've seen in a very long time. Kick ass Brian.

Chuck052
User Rank
Author
re: Intel names insider Brian Krzanich CEO
Chuck052   5/7/2013 2:36:22 PM
NO RATINGS
This is a perfect choice - an engineer with broad experience in operations. I would expect much clearer direction and commitment to execution than we've seen in a very long time. Kick ass Brian.

fourfaith
User Rank
Author
re: Intel names insider Brian Krzanich CEO
fourfaith   5/7/2013 6:57:19 AM
NO RATINGS
I also believe that the leadership needs to be very technical and not just bean counters.

fourfaith
User Rank
Author
re: Intel names insider Brian Krzanich CEO
fourfaith   5/7/2013 6:57:19 AM
NO RATINGS
I also believe that the leadership needs to be very technical and not just bean counters.

daleste
User Rank
Author
re: Intel names insider Brian Krzanich CEO
daleste   5/4/2013 3:35:00 AM
NO RATINGS
The comments are interesting. I think it is usually best to promote from within unless the company really needs a big change in direction. I don't think Intel is a company that needs a big change in direction. As the largest semiconductor company in the world, their task is to maintain momentum. Incremental improvements will beat huge changes. I also believe that the leadership needs to be very technical and not just bean counters. If you let the finance guys run the company, you will make a lot of money for a short time.

daleste
User Rank
Author
re: Intel names insider Brian Krzanich CEO
daleste   5/4/2013 3:35:00 AM
NO RATINGS
The comments are interesting. I think it is usually best to promote from within unless the company really needs a big change in direction. I don't think Intel is a company that needs a big change in direction. As the largest semiconductor company in the world, their task is to maintain momentum. Incremental improvements will beat huge changes. I also believe that the leadership needs to be very technical and not just bean counters. If you let the finance guys run the company, you will make a lot of money for a short time.

Page 1 / 7   >   >>
Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed