Breaking News
News & Analysis

Microsoft-ARM deal is a game-changer

7/23/2010 10:52 AM EDT
8 comments
NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 2 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
re: Microsoft-ARM deal is a game-changer
Peter Clarke   7/26/2010 11:41:41 AM
NO RATINGS
It is as you say Microchip Manny, but maybe to be differentiating these days companies have to design the hardware to run the software. The consumer customers don't care who designed which bits, but they want a smooth and satisfying experience - like Apple used to provide, but have struggled with recently. Microsoft will continue to be known as software company, or a games console company...but it doesn't stop it putting hardware engineers to work, legs paddling like mad under the surface of the water, to try and create a better, differentiated set of products.

Microchip_Manny
User Rank
Rookie
re: Microsoft-ARM deal is a game-changer
Microchip_Manny   7/26/2010 8:49:02 AM
NO RATINGS
Although most of us engineers got into the profession for the joy and excitement of creating and working with the leading edge technology, we should also read some business books in addition to technology books. One such book that I read called "22 Immutable Laws Of Marketing" should be circulated at Microsoft. Shoot they are mentioned in the book. Changing Microsoft from a software company into a hardware company will be hard and maybe even impossible at this late stage in the game. As mentioned in the book, it is not that Harley Davidson could not make a good automobile, but the name is SO associated with motorcycles, for better or for worse. The same is true of Microsoft, they will always be viewed as a software company primarily who happens to do some hardware. But their hardware is ALL really "me too" hardware as they provide nothing that is unique on the hardware front. I will be curious to see how this plays out, as I was part of the team at Qualcomm when they got their ARM architectural license and it was anything but smooth...and Qualcomm IS a hardware company!

garydpdx
User Rank
CEO
re: Microsoft-ARM deal is a game-changer
garydpdx   7/26/2010 5:38:34 AM
NO RATINGS
MS did hire computer architect Marc Tremblay from Sun (pre-Oracle acquisition) a year ago. So they must have desires to provide their own optimized designs, maybe not market their own chips but have others do so for (e.g.) Windows Phone 7 devices.

eewiz
User Rank
CEO
re: Microsoft-ARM deal is a game-changer
eewiz   7/26/2010 3:03:20 AM
NO RATINGS
I guess Microsoft want to update ARM CPU to add windows phone specific instructions and accelerators so that it can improve the device performance. And finally bundle the OS and CPU together and sell to mobile phone manufacturers. This way MS can dictate HW on the device to some extend and would be competitive advantage over android.

Mike Demler
User Rank
Rookie
re: Microsoft-ARM deal is a game-changer
Mike Demler   7/25/2010 4:47:17 AM
NO RATINGS
I doubt that "Apple-envy" is the most significant factor here. The real "fear factor" is more likely Google. Between the rise of Android (almost 100% on ARM-based processors), and the soon to be released Google Chrome OS, Microsoft is being attacked on all sides. The company is desperately in need of success with Windows Phone 7, just to hold onto 4th place in mobile OS. Now Google is also getting ready to attack netbooks, the fastest growing segment of the PC market. With Intel focusing on MeeGo, and also lacking success in the smartphone market theselves.. Microsoft has no choice but to expand their hardware platform options.

Daniel Payne
User Rank
CEO
re: Microsoft-ARM deal is a game-changer
Daniel Payne   7/23/2010 8:07:38 PM
NO RATINGS
Oh no, more bugs and re-booting of my consumer electronic devices with Windows OS.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Microsoft-ARM deal is a game-changer
rick merritt   7/23/2010 6:51:03 PM
NO RATINGS
I suspect the architectural license is motivated by a desire to make next-gen Zunes and Kins to compete with Apple and establish its mobile software...i.e. to create a Microsoft version of the A4. Windows on PCs and servers is something I suspect Microsoft will explore but resist for many more years.

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
re: Microsoft-ARM deal is a game-changer
Peter Clarke   7/23/2010 1:12:49 PM
NO RATINGS
Do you see SoftARM being a collaboration that can grow to rival Wintel? And how does this make Intel feel? Many ARM advocates loved the idea of avoiding Wintel and wanted to run open-source everything on ARM processors. Will a SoftARM axis be seen in a positive or negative light by users, investors?

August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.