SAN JOSE -- Could Michele Bachmann be right about advanced lighting technology?
Congresswoman Bachmann, former Republican presidential hopeful, has led a campaign for several years in defense of the historic Tom Edison-style incandescent lightbulb, against government pressure for consumers to adopt new, more energy-efficient lighting solutions.
Michael Poplawski, meanwhile, has led one of the government’s teams – at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory – seeking to solve issues that currently hobble the widespread deployment of LED (Light Emitting Diode) technology, which remains both more expensive and far more efficient than Rep. Bachmann’s beloved tungsten-filament vacuum tube.
“Complicated,” was the commonest word from Poplawski, senior energy engineer at the Portland, Oregon national lab, as he spoke to a session at the DESIGN West conference here Tuesday. He cited numerous complications in the effective use by consumers of LED lighting, and obstacles to reducing costs for the technology.
One of the points Poplawski stressed was that every LED light is a solid-state (SSL) electronic device, while a lightbulb is just, well, a lightbulb. In a presentation that exceeded its planned duration by some 30 minutes, Poplawski dwelt on four problems that his group is working to resolve: flicker, dimmability, power quality, and lifetime limitations linked to “driver reliability.”
Flicker, for example, is not just a relative of the yellow-bellied sapsucker.
Flicker is inherent in every form of electric lighting and it affects everyone differently, according to individual levels of visual sensitivity. “A good chunk of people,” said Poplawski, with a measure of awe, “are seeing things (flicker) at upwards of a thousand hertz.” Flicker’s biggest moment in the limelight occurred in the film, “The Andromeda Strain,” when the stroboscopic flashing of a laboratory light caused one of the characters to suffer an epileptic seizure.
Poplawski mentioned the danger of seizures, and added other side-effects of flicker, including headaches, fatigue, blurred vision, eye strain, reduced visual task performance and distraction on the job.
The good news about LED lighting is that it can reduce flicker, especially compared to standard fluorescent lights. The bad news is a determination by researchers that flicker – which is consistent and predictable in current lighting systems – is more “complicated” in SSL. It tends to vary substantially, both in amplitude and frequency, in various LED bulbs.
Among the solutions Poplawski’s national lab is exploring is the development of LED solutions with minimal flicker, which requires researchers to identify and measure qualitatively (in terms of human reaction) the presence of flicker. In the end, flicker must be measurable in a way that its level can be reported to consumers in a way they’ll understand it.
Among other issues with which Poplawski’s team is wrestling is dimmability. Many homes are equipped with dimmers, virtually all of them designed to dim conventional incandescent and fluorescent lights. The difficulties of designing LED bulbs that react to existing dimming technologies required Poplawski 20 minutes to explain. The adaptation is not easy. Poplawski boiled it down to the fact that consumers don’t know what will happen when they use their twentieth-century dimmer to soften the glare from a post-millenial high-tech bulb. “There’s no predictability today,” said Poplawski. “We operate in a built world with existing products and there, the challenges are significant.”
Similarly difficult is the issue of power quality, the consistency of power flow into the home and its lighting system. “Events” like lightning strikes and power surges can affect LED lights in different ways than they impact older systems. Moreover, the addition of SSL networks to existing power, cable TV and telephone networks – often clustered together on the same utility poles – can result in interference that compromises one or all of the networks.
Poplawski also cited the problem of “driver reliability.” Old-fashioned “drivers” – or lamps -- are often inappropriate vehicles for new-fashioned LED bulbs, causing problems like overheating that can shorten the operating life of the new bulbs. If the bulbs blow out earlier than promised, the advantage of the new technology shrinks significantly.
Indeed, thousands of new bulbs screwed into old sockets and ancient sconces have died well before their predicted demise, souring many consumers, especially the Congresswoman from Minnesota, on the promise of LED lighting. “You don’t know,” lamented Poplawski, “where people are going to stick things.”
In the end, Poplawski found himself suggesting an infrastructure problem similar to that hindering the use of electric automobiles. The installed power-supply base is incompatible with the new forms of power.
President George W. Bush launched the lightbulb wars in America by signing the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, which recommended a phase-out of the tungsten-filament bulb. Five years later, however, Rep. Bachmann’s cherished GE Soft-White is still ubiquitous in the land. Apparently, it will remain so for many years to come, glowing wastefully beneath dusty shades in graceful but obsolete drivers (lamps).
60 vdc is still too high for the small number of diodes found in most lamps. Without switching, dc regulators (drivers) are extremely lossy, so we're back to switching regulators. Might as well use ac in the first place. The problem is that inherently the different type of light sources are not all equally suited for every application. It will be years before anyone can come up with a cost equivalent replacement for a 75 watt incandescent for a closet. Let the free market and customer needs, not government edicts and subsidies determine which lamp goes in which socket.
What part of a free market economy don't you understand? Without advertising exactly how do you expect customers to make informed, self-serving purchasing decisions? I would certainly agree that advertising needs to be honest. Oh--your 'free' universities--do the profs work for nothing over there? If not, who pays them?
I am pretty sure they have in Europe as they are very big on total energy consumption not just end user, they were and maybe still are also more concerned about what the load looks like for the energy provider i.e. the device P.F.
There is no such thing as a totally free market, all markets are regulated to some degree. I do agree there is such a thing as over regulating a market and the incandescent might be one of those as I think it will probably die a natural death if left alone. Please also consider that almost all the people who supply your electricity are regulated.
Has anyone ever calculated how much energy/resources are consumed in the manufacture of ALL the components in an LED light? I wonder how much more efficient they really are when this is taken into account.
Join our online Radio Show on Friday 11th July starting at 2:00pm Eastern, when EETimes editor of all things fun and interesting, Max Maxfield, and embedded systems expert, Jack Ganssle, will debate as to just what is, and is not, and embedded system.