Breaking News
News & Analysis

Apple captive Cirrus gagged

Jealously guarding the biggest customer's name
7/31/2012 12:58 PM EDT
39 comments
NO RATINGS
< Previous Page 2 / 2
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 4 / 4
junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
re: Apple captive Cirrus gagged
junko.yoshida   7/31/2012 3:47:42 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes. It was a wink, wink, nudge nudge situation.

krisi
User Rank
CEO
re: Apple captive Cirrus gagged
krisi   7/31/2012 3:35:18 PM
NO RATINGS
Everyone knew it was Apple?

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
re: Apple captive Cirrus gagged
junko.yoshida   7/31/2012 3:33:00 PM
NO RATINGS
I have another separate question for everyone. i wrote in this story: Cirrus Logic’s behavior -- jealously guarding the name of its biggest customer -- and the financial community compliance strikes an odd note, especially since Cirrus Logic on Monday filed Form 10-Q with the SEC. In fact, in the 10-Q, Cirrus Logic reported: “We had one end customer, Apple Inc. that purchased through multiple contract manufacturers and represented approximately 59 percent and 53 percent of the Company's total sales for the first quarter of fiscal years 2013 and 2012, respectively.” So, I am still scratching my head why NOBODY in the conference call would NOT mention the name Apple at all.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
re: Apple captive Cirrus gagged
junko.yoshida   7/31/2012 3:13:33 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree with your assessment -- especially on Cirrus front. But then, here's the thing. That means, while Apple has everything to win, Cirrus will everything to lose, once it gets designed out. Shouldn't Cirrus get compensated for this very lopsided position they are now in?

eewiz
User Rank
CEO
re: Apple captive Cirrus gagged
eewiz   7/31/2012 2:58:11 PM
NO RATINGS
Apple would want to acquire chip/other companies for several reasons. 1) it has 100B cash in Bank and investors are pestering them to use it somehow :D 2) Block access to key & uncommon tech to competition (Anolbit,Authentec) 3) Bring inhouse the key and high value components (CPU, maps) so that there dependency on others are reduced. (PAsemi, integrity, C3 ,Placebase) Actually Cirrus logic doesnt fall into key tech/uncommon/high value components. Hence Apple will have less motivation to acquire them.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
re: Apple captive Cirrus gagged
junko.yoshida   7/31/2012 2:37:03 PM
NO RATINGS
OK. I got the logistics of how Apple can buy Cirrus at a reasonable price. What I don't understand is the reasons why Apple would every want to buy any perifpheral chip companies (including Authentic acquisition announced yesterday: http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4391386/Apple-to-acquire-fingerprint-chip-firm-Authentec) Would anyone care to walk me through its pros and cons?

krisi
User Rank
CEO
re: Apple captive Cirrus gagged
krisi   7/31/2012 2:25:22 PM
NO RATINGS
Interesting thought @eewiz...use Cirrus Logic for gen1, find an alternative supplier for gen2, wait for the stock to go down the drain, aquire Cirrus Logic then and get them to design gen3! Kris

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
re: Apple captive Cirrus gagged
junko.yoshida   7/31/2012 2:15:28 PM
NO RATINGS
Convoluted, but makes sense.

eewiz
User Rank
CEO
re: Apple captive Cirrus gagged
eewiz   7/31/2012 2:07:13 PM
NO RATINGS
Cirrus Logic would have been a good acquisition target for Apple if not for its current market valuation of 2.4B which is 10 times its 2009 valuation. The current valuation is basically because of its Apple business and the day Apple finds another vendor, Cirrus logic stock will nose dive, which will again make it a good acquisition target for Apple. Convoluted hah? http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3ACRUS

<<   <   Page 4 / 4
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.