NEW YORK -- Weighted down by an expected annual loss estimated at $5.6 billion, embattled Sharp Corp. warned that it may not be able to survive as an independent company.
Sharp is now forecasting a full-year net loss totaling 450 billion yen ($5.6 billion). In August, it had projected a 250 yen billion loss for the year.
After announcing a massive quarterly loss on Thursday (Nov. 1), the company cited "serious negative operating cash flow," underscoring growing concerns about its ability to survive as an independent company.
The latest results underscore the harsh reality faced by the 100-year-old Japanese company left with with few options.
Despite asset sales along with job and pay cuts, Sharp continues to struggle. It secured a 360 billion yen ($4.64 billion) syndicated loan from Japanese banks last month. The loan, scheduled to run until June 30, 2013, provides short-term relief as the company looks for other way to survive.
But time is running short. In August, Standard & Poor's cut Sharp's credit rating to junk status. That followed huge quarterly losses by the former Japanese consumer electronics giant.
"Sharp's liquidity position has weakened, and the company is highly dependent on short-term borrowings in light of weak internal cash flow and a less favorable funding environment," the ratings agency said.
Sharp could swallow its pride and give in to the terms and conditions demanded by Terry Gou, chairman of Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., also known as Foxconn, making the Taiwan-based group Sharp’s biggest shareholder.
It is due to a number of write-offs the company had to make.
In the first half of the current fiscal year alone (April to September, 2012), Sharp said it made a net loss of 387.5 billion yen as a result of rising restructuring costs and falling demand for LCD televisions.
It booked 84.4 billion yen of extraordinary charges as it wrote off the value of surplus display inventory and pulled out of solar panel manufacturing.
It also wrote off 61 billion yen of so-called deferred tax assets – corporate-tax credits it could redeem if it returned to profit. But that's a prospect that doesn't look good for now.
Maybe the firm needs to just focus in on just a few of its more profitable business units and sell of the rest. That way it could stay independent, and run leaner and meaner. Easy to say, tough to do, I know... but it's not like the company doesn't have a choice.
If Sharp gets rid of its LCD operation, there is really nothing left.
It's got solar, but that's tanking -- everywhere in the world.
Presumably, Sharp could focus on small-screen LCDs for mobile. But then, again, that's a very competitive market.
The fact that it makes harder for a Japanese company to make a huge change, as discussed in the thread here, is the following. Japanese companies, in general, are not in the habit of ruthlessly cutting employees at the first sign of decline in any given quarter.
They won't act fast.
But to their credit, Japanese companies are much more paternalistic. They see themselves socially responsible for taking care of their employees.
Being socially responsible is actually making lots of sense for me...we tend to dump engineers in North America at every sign of biz weakness...good for companies, perhaps, not so good for the society at large...kris
I agree, Kris.
I feel ambivalent every time when I report on quarterly results.
But those are the early warning signs no companies should take it lightly, and they should come up with a strategy -- quickly.
If Sharp runs themselves into ground, then, there will be no Sharp and no place to work!
It's still on. But Sharp reportedly has had problems in manufacturing its IGZO panels, which led to a substantial delay in delivery. Plesae read the story here:
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.