Breaking News
News & Analysis

Achronix 6 billion-transistor FPGAs: Take two

12/4/2012 03:45 PM EST
18 comments
NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 2 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
epa0723
User Rank
Rookie
re: Achronix 6 billion-transistor FPGAs: Take two
epa0723   1/30/2013 2:11:28 AM
NO RATINGS
"Contractor Mortgages":http://www.contractormortgages.com

epa0723
User Rank
Rookie
re: Achronix 6 billion-transistor FPGAs: Take two
epa0723   1/30/2013 2:04:16 AM
NO RATINGS
Adapting IP strategy is really tough. However as we know the demand are so high and it boost up the marketplace. - [url=http://o2media.us/contact-o2-media/]O2 Media[/url]

betajet
User Rank
CEO
re: Achronix 6 billion-transistor FPGAs: Take two
betajet   12/7/2012 8:09:57 PM
NO RATINGS
IMO what FPGA vendors need (and what they've always needed) is to open up their architectures and bit stream formats so that FLOSS software developers can take a crack at it. There are myriad applications for FPGAs that aren't progressing well because it's too cumbersome to use the vendors' tools. These include reconfigurable computing and specialized high-performance parallel architecture. It's just too hard to make progress in these areas with vendor tools so the people working in those areas simply do it in other ways, causing FPGA vendors to miss out on a lot of opportunity and miss out on the savings of letting others write their tools. JMO/YMMV

Kevin Neilson
User Rank
Manager
re: Achronix 6 billion-transistor FPGAs: Take two
Kevin Neilson   12/7/2012 5:36:48 AM
NO RATINGS
These small FPGA companies need some good 3rd-party tools. They can hand off the synthesis to Synplify, but somebody needs to make some 3rd-party place & route tool that can service all these little FPGA companies. Surely 80% of the work is common to different architectures.

Kevin Neilson
User Rank
Manager
re: Achronix 6 billion-transistor FPGAs: Take two
Kevin Neilson   12/7/2012 4:27:09 AM
NO RATINGS
So what's the story with these FPGAs? Are they really clockless, as the name states, or did they abandon that scheme?

jg_
User Rank
Rookie
re: Achronix 6 billion-transistor FPGAs: Take two
jg_   12/6/2012 10:16:07 PM
NO RATINGS
I think the 'mobile applications' has an inferred 'Mobile infrastructure applications' - and certainly those base stations care far less about power, than throughput and flexibility.

song-chou-1
User Rank
Rookie
re: Achronix 6 billion-transistor FPGAs: Take two
song-chou-1   12/6/2012 4:13:50 PM
NO RATINGS
We hear even with Intel matching TSMC with die-pricing (a loss leader for Intel), Achronix 22nm part is not competitive (power and leakage) with other FPGA. why part not sampling why Achronix needs to change business model

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Achronix 6 billion-transistor FPGAs: Take two
resistion   12/6/2012 4:57:19 AM
NO RATINGS
The next question is how far can they get without interposer?

Roba66
User Rank
Rookie
re: Achronix 6 billion-transistor FPGAs: Take two
Roba66   12/5/2012 6:31:25 PM
NO RATINGS
The devices announced by Archronix are designed for backend fabric, they are loaded with serdes. It seems odd that Holt is talking about mobile applications: power management is very weak in FPGAs, maybe they have a different kind of configurability in mind, to knit together some Intel IP. I have not seen anything about design software yet from this company, which is normally a big concern for FPGAs. It makes me think Intel may have more of a hand in the overall enterprise here than is evident at this point.

fundamentals
User Rank
Manager
re: Achronix 6 billion-transistor FPGAs: Take two
fundamentals   12/5/2012 4:42:46 PM
NO RATINGS
The last succesful FPGA start-up company was Actel, who shipped their first product in 1988. You could say "it's been a while since then". Indeed, but not for lack of trying. More than 25 start-ups have tried and failed. Most failed by the nature of their FPGAs, and a few failed by the market barriers erected by the four FPGA vendors. You cannot make a business out of FPGAs by making a new FPGA that is slightly faster or slightly cheaper than what is out there. To succeed you must double the FPGA performance or cut the price-per-LUT by half. Acronix long ago claimed to have done the first of these, but they could not deliver on that promise, even with Intel's fanciest process. So they change the business model to survive for a little while longer. Everybody comments on how tough the IP business is, but the FPGA business is much tougher. Their new tack is an acknowledgement of this fact.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Most Recent Comments
mhrackin
 
David Ashton
 
Snausage
 
Snausage
 
drsimm1776
 
eetcowie
 
mhrackin
 
Max The Magnificent
 
Max The Magnificent
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
How to Cope with a Burpy Comet
October 17, 2pm EDT Friday
EE Times Editorial Director Karen Field interviews Andrea Accomazzo, Flight Director for the Rosetta Spacecraft.