Breaking News
News & Analysis

Cable operators seek migration path to IP

How did Zenverge sneak in?
3/12/2013 05:20 PM EDT
6 comments
NO RATINGS
1 saves
< Previous Page 3 / 3
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
re: Cable operators seek migration path to IP
junko.yoshida   3/14/2013 4:35:46 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree, Frank. That's the direction things are heading to. Headless media home gateway, integrated with residential gateway, is poised to come with a transcoding chip such as that of Zenverge.

old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Rookie
re: Cable operators seek migration path to IP
old account Frank Eory   3/13/2013 9:55:26 PM
NO RATINGS
"the simple and elegant solution is to eliminate those broadcast QAM/MPEG-2 channels entirely." Simple and elegeant yes, but also expensive. Replace all the edge QAMs in every neighborhood as well as replace every subscriber's STB. That's billions of dollars worth of simple & elegant. What they need is an econmically viable transition plan that shifts the network allocation to less QAM/MPEG2 and more DOCSIS/IP without bankrupting the company. Perhaps Zenverge's transcoding strategy can be part of such a plan. If so, I expect it will happen more in the headless gateway realm rather than in the STB realm.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
re: Cable operators seek migration path to IP
Bert22306   3/13/2013 7:45:12 PM
NO RATINGS
Cable companies don't need anything they don't already have, Junko, other than reconfiguring their existing infrastructure to more IP and less one-way streams. That's my point. (Also DrQuine's point.) If you're going to have to install new STBs anyway, to make use of this Zenverge scheme, why not instead install STBs in which most or all of the 6 MHz channels on the cable can be allocated to Internet broadband access? That being done, now the cable company can offer more Internet bandwidth to their customers, and more, or even all, of their TV content over IP. Which they are already doing anyway, for access to tablets and smartphones. In other words, nothing new needs to be invented. Just reapportion what you already have. It seems to me that Zenverge would have more appeal to the satellite TV companies, where the two-way Internet pipes are far more difficult to provide.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
re: Cable operators seek migration path to IP
junko.yoshida   3/13/2013 1:35:11 PM
NO RATINGS
There are many paths cable companies can take to eventually get to all IP infrastructure. I think a "transcoding" at home option Zenverge is offering is an interesting one. Actually, a real story is how Zenverge managed to sneak into the STB market -- traditionally a stronghold of Broadcom and STMicroelectronics. If things are transitioning to "headless" media home gateway architecture as Zenverge claims, what cable guys will need is not an overly complicated STB, but just a thin client and a MHG integrated with a residential gateway. That transition, in my opinion, is interesting to watch.

DrQuine
User Rank
CEO
re: Cable operators seek migration path to IP
DrQuine   3/13/2013 12:47:12 AM
NO RATINGS
Since most cable providers are already offering broadcast and Internet to consumers along the same residential coax, shifting the balance between them would seem to be a very manageable task. It would be much more of a problem if the two could not coexist in the same wire or if devices didn't already exist to split the feeds at the residential end.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
re: Cable operators seek migration path to IP
Bert22306   3/12/2013 8:05:07 PM
NO RATINGS
I'm sure that Zenverge wants to appeal to the traditional cable company architecture and cost structure, making the existing cableco broadcast channel(cable broadcast, that is) QAM/MPEG-2 streams relevant to IP devices. But honestly, the simple and elegant solution is to eliminate those broadcast QAM/MPEG-2 channels entirely, and convert the cableco PON networks to two-way IP pipes more effectively and completely. For instance, instead of retaining the vast majority of the PON's 6 MHz channels for one-way broadcast QAM/MPEG-2 TV streams, you distribute these 6 MHz channels to individual households in each PON neighborhood, as their IP broadband link. Making much more efficient use of the PON's capacity to provide two-way IP pipes. Having done that, each household would have enough capacity to watch two, three, maybe more, HDTV streams that are IP encapsulated. For those live events that "everyone" wants to watch simultaneously, the cableco can deliver the streams as IP multicast, within the confines of their network, to save on unicast sessions. The Zenverge solution could be a short-term transitional solution maybe, although I'm not even sure how necessary it is today. I thought a lot of cable companies were already providing IP streams for their customers "anywhere/anytime." Seems to me that there are no show-stopper technical obstacles anymore, in this regard. The only obstacles are that the cablecos want to retain their tiered bundles and pricing structure. And even there, ultimately they could do this over an all-IP network anyway.

Most Recent Comments
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
Join our online Radio Show on Friday 11th July starting at 2:00pm Eastern, when EETimes editor of all things fun and interesting, Max Maxfield, and embedded systems expert, Jack Ganssle, will debate as to just what is, and is not, and embedded system.
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week