Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Research

SuVolta positions DDC as node life extender

6/21/2012 12:58 PM EDT
2 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Johnc1
User Rank
Rookie
re: SuVolta positions DDC as node life extender
Johnc1   6/22/2012 2:16:56 AM
NO RATINGS
http://m.extremetech.com/extremetech/#!/entry/nvidia-deeply-unhappy-with-tsmc-claims-22nm-essentially-worthless,4f6ca976a5e91dbd69000129/5 Nvidia made related comments. We can debate the node 20? 14? But transistor cost even at maturity is not really lower at some point. So that begs the question why pay for higher cost for a few years just to get to cost parity? Even at the 20nm node our company thinking was 20nm MIGHT only make sense for application processors chips. All other chips like wifi, we think will stay at 40/28nm. Interesting that even Nvida questions value of 20nm? They have historically been 1st movers and helped bebug yield and design rule issues to help make 65 /45/40 viable for industry.

Johnc1
User Rank
Rookie
re: SuVolta positions DDC as node life extender
Johnc1   6/21/2012 9:51:31 PM
NO RATINGS
seems right . For more and more of our product line, ROI is staying at mature node longer and moving to advanced node later. If mature node is improved more, even better. At a high level this is driven by the increasing cost of the advance node plus the advanced node delievering less "goodness" over time.

Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week