Breaking News
Design How-To

Buck-boost vs. buck converter: it's about battery life in portables

NO RATINGS
1 saves
Page 1 / 3 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Chuck Sampson
User Rank
Rookie
Why not use inverting buck boost?
Chuck Sampson   9/22/2013 4:12:46 PM
NO RATINGS
It seem obvious to me that non-inverting buck boost for this particular application is a poor choice. The larger footprint and cost would make me chose the sync buck right off. 

But what about using a inverting buck boost? If the source is a battery why not connect it up so that the micro gets the proper polarity voltage it needs? You could operate the inverting buck boost in transistion mode for high efficiency and the footprint would be the no larger than the syncbuck.

The other issue though is that the battery voltage really never goes low enough to warrant the boost in voltage. 

August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.