Breaking News
Design How-To

Building PID predictive controls

8/17/2010 09:52 AM EDT
3 comments
NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 3 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
MARK ALAN
User Rank
Rookie
re: Building PID predictive controls
MARK ALAN   4/6/2013 11:24:57 PM
NO RATINGS
You must be a complete Idiot. If you want it in "C", and you are not smart enough to translate it yourself, use a compiler and shutup.

sanjaac
User Rank
Rookie
re: Building PID predictive controls
sanjaac   8/25/2010 3:00:36 PM
NO RATINGS
Isn't it Figure 9-4 wrong? The values from the set-point gain and rabbit-d gain are summed, as well as are the values from p-gain and i-gain. And what happens next in the node before the amp? Are they summed up? Are they both amplified as separate signals?

rdipaolo
User Rank
Rookie
re: Building PID predictive controls
rdipaolo   8/19/2010 5:49:03 PM
NO RATINGS
Great article, but why BASIC source code????? BASIC is for hobbyists, or those who don't write software for a living. Nearly 100% of other articles related to embedded development show source code examples in 'C' - which I'm sure we all know is the "lingua franca" of embedded development. To publish source code in BASIC as an example tends to make the article seem a bit amateurish.

August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.