Breaking News
Design How-To

Loudspeakers: Objective evaluations - Part 3: Comparing the subjective and objective domains

1/26/2011 05:55 PM EST
2 comments
NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 2 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Threaded | Newest First | Oldest First
bcarso
User Rank
Rookie
re: Loudspeakers: Objective evaluations - Part 3: Comparing the subjective and objective domains
bcarso   1/27/2011 6:47:02 PM
NO RATINGS
Knew that M had to be an electrostat before I read the text :) It would be interesting to drive a conventional loudspeaker system with a preceding EQ that simulated the M frequency response. Although this wouldn't help/hinder the directionality issues, I wonder if some listeners wouldn't key into the response and start raving about "transparency that only comes with small moving masses" etc.?

huynh750
User Rank
Rookie
re: Loudspeakers: Objective evaluations - Part 3: Comparing the subjective and objective domains
huynh750   5/17/2011 8:02:06 AM
NO RATINGS
dear toole, i know that you're a member of the A.E.S.,everything you wrote about listening tests for the purpose of assesment of louspeaker to find which kind of measurements had true correlation with the subjective human perception of sound made a lot of sense,i gues that you use good ancillary electronis to drive the speakers...

Top Comments of the Week
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.
Flash Poll