Application specific integrated circuits (ASICs) typically conjure up the notion of massively complex logic chips containing tens or hundreds of thousands (even millions) of transistors configured to solve a customer’s unique set of problems. Unlike multi-function standard product ICs such as a micro-controller that can find its way into a wide variety of applications, ASICs are designed for one specific application and generally for one specific product or product family.To better understand the role and applicability of ASICs, it is important to briefly review their historical origins.
The first integrated circuits from the early ‘60s contained just a few transistors and performed simple digital logic functions such as "and", "or", "nor", etc. These were called SSI devices, meaning small-scale integration. As photolithography techniques improved, more and more transistors could be built on a single sliver of silicon. Soon, chip companies were developing medium scale integration (MSI) functions like flip-flops, buffers, latches, etc (10-100 transistors). Large-scale integration or LSI (100-1,000 transistors) and eventually VLSI (up to 100,000 transistors) ICs followed, providing lower system costs and higher levels of performance. Today, of course, we have digital chips in excess of a billion transistors thanks to advanced sub-micron lithography and the low voltage, high speed processes upon which they are built.
The first digital ASICs were built using a standard cell library consisting of fixed-height, variable-width ‘tiles’ containing the digital logic functions discussed above. The ability to reuse these blocks over and over saved time and money when designing a custom logic IC. Analog ICs were initially comprised of a pair of matched transistors and soon expanded to include rudimentary op amps, voltage regulators, comparators, timers and much more.
Demands of analog
Analog applications typically involve much higher voltages, so these ICs needed their own unique set of manufacturing processes. More recently, market demands for smaller size, higher speeds and lower power consumption have forced a merging of analog and digital functionality on a single silicon chip. Cells consisting of the basic analog building blocks discussed above were created and added to the digital libraries. These Analog cells were restricted to the digital fab processes developed for predominately logic applications.
Today, most ASIC companies offer some degree of analog functionality as a part of their services. In many cases, the analog functions are mimicked with digital design techniques. In others, compromises to the analog functionality must be made to facilitate the use of standard library cells that are designed to yield well in the fab processes developed for high speed, high density, low power digital designs. Often, these chips are referred to as Mixed-signal ASICs or as big “D”, little “A” ASICs, meaning high digital content and minimal analog content.
Analog ASICs play a critical role in our lives. Without them, none of the portable electronic devices we use in our daily lives would exist. Imagine a world without cell phones, MP3 players and navigation systems. Building them with standard products would make them prohibitively expensive and physically impossible to carry in our purses or pockets. Every automobile contains dozens of ASIC chips for everything from climate control to airbag deployment; suspension control to entertainment systems. ASICs also play important roles in applications for hospital medical equipment, eMeters, home appliances such as washers and dryers, scuba gear, hearing aids, and much more.
Picking an ASIC design partner
The analog ASIC market is huge. In fact, research firm IC Insights reports that almost 60% of the nearly $37B of analog ICs sold in 2010 were ASICs. Yet very few mixed-signal ASIC design houses fully understand the implications of custom analog design and its applicability to analog-centric ASICs. ASICs requiring high analog content should be directed to those design houses that specialize in analog circuit design rather than those who simply select analog IP blocks from a library. Analog ASIC companies have large staffs of competent, experienced, analog engineers with expertise in a wide range of analog functions.
Reviewing an ASIC house’s patent portfolio as a quick guide as to the creativity of its engineering team will serve as a first order measure of its analog expertise.
Clearly, the large analog IC houses (like ADI, Linear Tech, Maxim, National, TI) have patent portfolios a mile deep. Those that also engage in analog ASIC development set high bars regarding who can access this capability and impose high minimum order requirements. For example, TI reports that their application-specific analog business focuses on a small number of large customers like Seagate, Sony, Samsung, Hitachi Global Storage Technology, Toshiba and a few others that require custom application-specific products. Minimum annual unit and or dollar volumes force the majority of the smaller customers to seek out independent analog or mixed-signal ASIC design houses.
We have solved critical issue: size the transistors and optimize the circuit using Monte Carlo Simulation based optimization. It will solve many issues related to manual designs.
Reached very high yield optimizing over multiple process corners.
Product Overview: bit.ly/ago-pronov
thank you Frank, excellent clarification...there is probably no pure digital ASICs anymore today as high-speed IOs are always present event on very digital parts...and there are few pure analog ICs as well, modern analog requires digital control or tuning...but as you say there is a big difference between big D little A and little D big A. In the companies I worked for or with design methodologies are very different in both cases...dr Kris
Excellent article Bob. I'd like to add a couple more AMS myths to your list:
Myth #8: Some ICs are pure digital.
No, every IC is analog/mixed-signal. Some are overwhelmingly "Big D, Little A" -- a microprocessor, for example -- others are "Big A, Little D" and there is a large continuum of in-betweens. At a minimum, what some might call a pure digital IC contains at least I/O buffers, which might come from a vendor's library or might be hand-crafted. Either way, those are analog cells.
Myth #9: "Big D, Little A" and "Big A, Little D" ICs are designed using the same tools and methodology.
No, there is a Big D digital-oriented methodology in which analog cells are treated like white boxes and logic cells go everywhere else, and there is a Big A analog-oriented methodology in which everything is a cell, including large blocks of logic cells. The tools are different, the methodology is different, even the mindset of how to assemble the chip is different.
To @Kiran: mixed-signal manufacturing process would typically contain additional layers/masks for analog features: double poly for poly-to-poly capacitors (or MiM capacitors), high resistance poly (or salicide exclusion), HV layers, etc...dr Kris
Making mixed signal ASIC is definitely a challenging task without a right team of analog designers and using the standard cell libraries will not give an optimized ASIC all the time. Would be interesting if you can add some more details regarding the differences in manufacturing process of complete digital ASIC and a mixed signal ASIC with little/significant analog parts.
There are a few mixed signal programmable devices out there that may be sufficient for small quantities or proof of concept. Cypress PSoC is one of these and I am sure there will be more of these types of devices in the future. While these devices may not give the ultimate silicon integration, since they are off the shelf they may be less expensive in the long run and/or get you to market quicker while you are spinning the ASIC.
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.