The new generation of remote controls will be green – using very low power or none at all, will be interactive, and will be using radio, instead of infrared to transmit throughout the home. Next generation remote controls, set-top boxes and TVs, as well as a plethora of home devices like security monitors, sensors and controls, will be using ZigBee RF4CE (ZigBee Radio Frequency for Consumer Electronics). Originally developed by four of the biggest consumer electronics manufacturers – Panasonic, Philips, Samsung and Sony – this standard has moved under the aegis of the ZigBee Alliance and is now referred to as ZigBee RF4CE.??
Based upon the 2.4 GHz, IEEE 802.15.4 standard, the ZigBee Alliance has expanded the ZigBee RF4CE standard into several end user application areas. These three profiles, all using RF4CE, encompass ZigBee Input Devices (ZID), ZigBee 3D Sync (Z3S) and ZigBee remote control (ZRC).??
ZID was developed for touch pads, mice, keyboards, wands, etc., for use with a variety of laptops, computers, TV sets, set-top boxes and other electronic devices. Much better than the current crop of IR and Bluetooth devices used for these applications, the ZID profile allows consumers to use their devices from greater distances or even from another room because operation is not limited to line of sight. The ZID energy-efficient design helps devices run longer on batteries, when compared to infrared technology, and will greatly reduce the total number of batteries used – and disposed of – during the device's lifetime. ??
The standard offers native support of popular multi-touch and gesture commands, allowing manufacturers to deliver the most feature-rich products for their consumers. It also features the ability to define special functions and enhanced performance beyond the standard behavior of a mouse, keyboard or similar input device.??
The ZigBee Alliance developed ZigBee 3D Sync as a global standard for more convenient, flexible and enjoyable 3D HD viewing. By using RF instead of IR, users have greater freedom for personal movement without disrupting the 3D view when wearing 3D glasses. Moving your head will no longer create a possible viewing disruption. By avoiding IR, users can also minimize or eliminate interference that IR can be subjected to from ambient lighting and make products more energy efficient and greener. With ZigBee 3D Sync, 3D glasses will easily connect to a variety of video sources such as game consoles, Blu-ray players and 3D HDTVs and be assured of correct shutter manipulation. The standard will support variable display frame rates to ensure that the standard can be used with both existing and future display technology. Plus, the standard will support multiple viewing modes and automatically adjust 3D glasses when content changes between 2D or 3D.??
Designed to connect consumer electronics gear like TVs, home theater equipment, DVD and video players, set-top boxes, and audio equipment, ZigBee Remote Control provides a global standard for advanced, greener and easy-to-use RF remotes that removes line-of-sight restrictions while also delivering two-way communication, longer range of use and extended battery life. ZigBee Remote Control can also be used to connect and monitor home sensing applications such as air conditioning and heating, home security sensors, home health monitors, etc.
Unlike IR remotes, ZigBee Remote Control also supports interactivity which means that ZRC could support the use of display screens on the remote that could be used to show the volume controls of devices being controlled, what stations are being tuned, and even be used to set up and manage the recording of TV shows and movies on a DVR. Of special interest to the cable companies and service providers is the capability to support interactive shopping and polling.
Figure 1 - RemoteControl2.0 mock up - new interactive remote controls operating on ZigBee RF4CE will offer cool new features like "Find Me".
Another interesting application supported by ZRC's interactivity is a Find Me feature. If the remote control gets lost, the user simply presses a button on the TV or set-top box and the lost remote starts beeping and flashing, making it easy to find.??However, maybe the most appealing capability of ZRC is its ultra low power consumption. ZRC remote controls can be designed in such a way that they will last years without ever having to recharge or replace the batteries. In lab tests, a single watch type cell battery provides enough power to operate a ZRC remote control for over ten years.??A remote control's batteries will last longer using ZigBee Remote Control versus Infrared:
?Figure 2: ZigBee Alliance chart info – this is how long a remote control will run (in days) using various technologies – IR only, using IR for TV communication and ZigBee Remote Control for the STB, and using only ZigBee for both TV and STB???
Secret Sauce on top of the ZigBee Remote Control Standard?
Building upon the ZigBee Remote Control standard, it is possible to add technical refinements to ZRC that, while maintaining compliance and interoperability with the standard as established by ZigBee, further improve both robustness and ultra low power capabilities.??
For example, building upon their experience as the original developers of the IEEE 802.11 standard (Wi-Fi), the GreenPeak Technology engineers have developed specific ways to increase their ZRC chips’ resistance to interference from 2.4 GHz networks like Bluetooth and Wi-Fi. By using two separate antennas to avoid typical indoor wave cancellation, it is possible to obtain 30dB (1000x) better interference robustness as compared to standard ZigBee RF4CE. As more and more TVs and set-top boxes will be shipping with Wi-Fi internet connections, this diversity antenna robustness will become an essential component of an effective ZigBee Remote Control solution.
The beauty of ZigBee RF4CE remote controls is specifically in fast response time (allows gaming) and low power consumption, with smart two-way communication features that do not impact (a very long) battery life.
ZigBee wrote an interesting white paper on this:
ZigBee is a technology for private area networking. And this technology adopts new ideas. The scheduler and diversity antenna are the features of EVDO and LTE. Cees Links promotes these features to ZigBee. Well, what is the price of this promotion? Complexity? Stability?
Have Samsung TV with "ZigBee" Remote( Nearly a year or so old).It is not really ZigBee - using 802.15.4 - yes. Remote is nice/ Find function is ok. But batteries last less than in IR one. :) Test Rf control by sending TV commands from my test RF module
I think using RF and seeking low power consumption will result in a remote control with a slow response. It takes some time to bring up the RF link from sniff mode.
However, the benefit of not requiring to be in front of the TV becomes a good idea.
Now people will be able to play pranks by changing the channels without being in the room... "mal-functioning TV set?"
ACK when it comes to the topic "interoperability". The RF4CE standard should offer interoperability between devices of different manufacturers. But typically "vendor-specific" data fields or profiles cancels out the idea of a standard.
Regarding the wakeup-call:
The key to saving energy (battery power) while being online (receiving) is duty cycling. Most of the time the receiver is asleep and depending on the system design it wakes up (very fast), checks for messages in the channel, eventually performs some actions and finally goes back to sleep again. With the right duty cycle schedule you can run such a system for years from a coin cell.
What I see with this approach to remote control is a very effective way to prevent a consumer from utilizing a "universal remote" as a substitute control device. By switching to an RF link, that option is not possible by any means. A second advantage is the opening up to interference from other remote systems operating in the same band. One question I offer, which is about the "find-me" option, is how is such a long battery life available when there is a receiver listening for a wake-up call? Aside from that, it would seem that if the unit will run from a watch battery, then probably units will be sold with the battery soldered in and not consumer replaceable. So while this device does increase profits, it remains unclear what the actual consumer advantage is.
Join our online Radio Show on Friday 11th July starting at 2:00pm Eastern, when EETimes editor of all things fun and interesting, Max Maxfield, and embedded systems expert, Jack Ganssle, will debate as to just what is, and is not, and embedded system.