Breaking News
Design How-To

How to design next-generation RF remote controls

NO RATINGS
1 saves
Page 1 / 2 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Threaded | Newest First | Oldest First
JanineLove
User Rank
Blogger
re: How to design next-generation RF remote controls
JanineLove   4/12/2011 1:23:36 PM
NO RATINGS
Anyone out there following or working with RF4CE? What is your experience?

apummer945
User Rank
Rookie
re: How to design next-generation RF remote controls
apummer945   4/14/2011 12:31:48 PM
NO RATINGS
could you please print better quality pictures in your article? thanks

WKetel
User Rank
Rookie
re: How to design next-generation RF remote controls
WKetel   4/13/2011 1:01:04 PM
NO RATINGS
What I see with this approach to remote control is a very effective way to prevent a consumer from utilizing a "universal remote" as a substitute control device. By switching to an RF link, that option is not possible by any means. A second advantage is the opening up to interference from other remote systems operating in the same band. One question I offer, which is about the "find-me" option, is how is such a long battery life available when there is a receiver listening for a wake-up call? Aside from that, it would seem that if the unit will run from a watch battery, then probably units will be sold with the battery soldered in and not consumer replaceable. So while this device does increase profits, it remains unclear what the actual consumer advantage is.

Compotek_LB
User Rank
Rookie
re: How to design next-generation RF remote controls
Compotek_LB   4/13/2011 3:10:32 PM
NO RATINGS
@WKetel: ACK when it comes to the topic "interoperability". The RF4CE standard should offer interoperability between devices of different manufacturers. But typically "vendor-specific" data fields or profiles cancels out the idea of a standard. Regarding the wakeup-call: The key to saving energy (battery power) while being online (receiving) is duty cycling. Most of the time the receiver is asleep and depending on the system design it wakes up (very fast), checks for messages in the channel, eventually performs some actions and finally goes back to sleep again. With the right duty cycle schedule you can run such a system for years from a coin cell.

Luis Sanchez
User Rank
Rookie
re: How to design next-generation RF remote controls
Luis Sanchez   4/14/2011 9:30:22 PM
NO RATINGS
I think using RF and seeking low power consumption will result in a remote control with a slow response. It takes some time to bring up the RF link from sniff mode. However, the benefit of not requiring to be in front of the TV becomes a good idea. Now people will be able to play pranks by changing the channels without being in the room... "mal-functioning TV set?"

thba
User Rank
Rookie
re: How to design next-generation RF remote controls
thba   4/20/2011 6:21:13 AM
NO RATINGS
Typically a couple of ms is needed to start from a key-press event to sending a RF message.

finevlad
User Rank
Rookie
re: How to design next-generation RF remote controls
finevlad   4/15/2011 1:18:48 PM
NO RATINGS
Have Samsung TV with "ZigBee" Remote( Nearly a year or so old).It is not really ZigBee - using 802.15.4 - yes. Remote is nice/ Find function is ok. But batteries last less than in IR one. :) Test Rf control by sending TV commands from my test RF module

VNP
User Rank
Rookie
re: How to design next-generation RF remote controls
VNP   5/10/2011 2:00:51 PM
NO RATINGS
ZigBee is a technology for private area networking. And this technology adopts new ideas. The scheduler and diversity antenna are the features of EVDO and LTE. Cees Links promotes these features to ZigBee. Well, what is the price of this promotion? Complexity? Stability?

EllySchietse
User Rank
Rookie
re: How to design next-generation RF remote controls
EllySchietse   5/10/2011 3:05:48 PM
NO RATINGS
The beauty of ZigBee RF4CE remote controls is specifically in fast response time (allows gaming) and low power consumption, with smart two-way communication features that do not impact (a very long) battery life. ZigBee wrote an interesting white paper on this: http://www.zigbee.org/imwp/download.asp?ContentID=19575

Most Recent Comments
Kevin Krewell
 
daleste
 
Ian Johns
 
Etmax
 
daleste
 
alex_m1
 
Ian Johns
 
David Ashton
 
MeasurementBlues
Top Comments of the Week
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.
Flash Poll