Breaking News
Design How-To

6LoWPAN: The wireless embedded Internet - Part 1: Why 6LoWPAN?

NO RATINGS
1 saves
Page 1 / 3 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
t.alex
User Rank
Rookie
re: 6LoWPAN: The wireless embedded Internet - Part 1: Why 6LoWPAN?
t.alex   10/16/2011 10:09:37 AM
NO RATINGS
It doesn't mention when the implementation should be. For low power and processing speed, it is morr on frame size, etc.

sharps_eng
User Rank
Rookie
re: 6LoWPAN: The wireless embedded Internet - Part 1: Why 6LoWPAN?
sharps_eng   10/12/2011 7:30:49 PM
NO RATINGS
Aren't the stacks being part-implemented in hardware in the lowest-power designs?

t.alex
User Rank
Rookie
re: 6LoWPAN: The wireless embedded Internet - Part 1: Why 6LoWPAN?
t.alex   8/20/2011 1:14:48 AM
NO RATINGS
It will come down to implimentation because the whole stacks are huge still for embedded platforms.

August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.