Breaking News
Design How-To

Two methodologies for ASIC conversion

5/31/2011 06:30 PM EDT
2 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
juszza
User Rank
Rookie
re: Two methodologies for ASIC conversion
juszza   6/10/2011 12:25:23 AM
NO RATINGS
This is a great article. What it demonstrates is that FPGA-to-ASIC conversion is still a clunky hack. What is really needed is a single platform that is both reprogrammable during the design and test phase, low NRE for release-to-production and has all the density, power and cost benefits of an ASIC for volume production.

GalGilat
User Rank
Rookie
re: Two methodologies for ASIC conversion
GalGilat   6/5/2011 3:36:19 PM
NO RATINGS
Hi, That is a very nice article. 2 comments: 1. Beyond the flow, there is a difference in the unit price: while eASIC is based on structured ASIC, the die size and the process are fixed. On the other hand KaiSemi which targets the solution to standard-cell of standard fab processes as a custom ASIC, fits the optimized die size and process lib which bring a major cost reduction. 2. "The oppurtunity to enhance the design during conversion" is a real functional risk for a one-time ASIC burning. KaiSemi could support it, but it rather provide a functional gurantee over a final working FPGA.

August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.