Breaking News
Design How-To

FPGAs advance medical imaging

NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
krisi
User Rank
CEO
re: FPGAs advance medical imaging
krisi   11/24/2011 9:30:48 PM
NO RATINGS
Why would functionality in OCT need to he changed? (your argument against using ASICs)...granted at low volumes it always makes sense to use FPGA when prototyping the system but at some point it pays to switch to ASICs...we will not be building IPhones with FPGAs...Kris

CaseyW
User Rank
Rookie
re: FPGAs advance medical imaging
CaseyW   12/9/2011 7:47:11 PM
NO RATINGS
Thank you for your thoughts! The argument is that off-the-shelf hardware and FPGAs save both time and upfront cost during the prototyping stage, and may be economical for production depending on the number of deployed units and price sensitivity. While squeezing out every bit of cost may be advantageous in a volume scenario (as with your iPhone example), in lower volume designs or less cost sensitive markets deploying with FPGAs and/or off-the-shelf hardware can make sense.

krisi
User Rank
CEO
re: FPGAs advance medical imaging
krisi   12/10/2011 3:41:37 PM
NO RATINGS
thank you Casey, I am editing a book on medical electronics, would you be interested in expanding your thoughts into a book chapter? kris.iniewski@gmail.com

August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.