Breaking News
Design How-To

Oscilloscope memory depth: when bigger is not always better

Scope Architecture
NO RATINGS
1 saves
< Previous Page 2 / 3 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
caperiver1999@gmail.com
User Rank
Rookie
tables and graphs would be good
caperiver1999@gmail.com   5/27/2014 9:54:42 PM
NO RATINGS
Can you please add the tables and figures? Thought this might be a browser issue but the article doesn't seem to descriminate here.

Michael.Lauterbach
User Rank
Rookie
re: Oscilloscope memory depth: when bigger is not always better
Michael.Lauterbach   3/21/2012 3:34:12 PM
NO RATINGS
To those of us who know oscilloscope architectures this piece is a thinly veiled attack by Agilent on Tektronix. I suppose from the writer's point of view that is worthwhile. But he ignores a few major points: 1. Most scopes these days have a fast update mode for when the user simply wants to view the data. 2. In some cases viewing the signal is enough but very often the user needs measurements. In this case the waveform needs to go to the CPU. The LeCroy X-Stream (extremely fast, streaming) architechture makes measurements much faster than other architectures.

docdivakar
User Rank
Manager
re: Oscilloscope memory depth: when bigger is not always better
docdivakar   3/14/2012 12:34:33 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for an informative article. @Rich Krajewski: good call, it would be nice to see a Youtube video version of this! MP Divakar

Wing traces in the sky
User Rank
Rookie
re: Oscilloscope memory depth: when bigger is not always better
Wing traces in the sky   3/14/2012 5:48:54 AM
NO RATINGS
What's the waveform update rate when you set the scope memory depth or record length to 10M ? The maximum memory depth of scope available today is 2Gpts per channel,which is good for single shot analysis , but not for fast waveform update rate .

agk
User Rank
Rookie
re: Oscilloscope memory depth: when bigger is not always better
agk   3/9/2012 6:21:13 AM
NO RATINGS
I used two scopes for the same application with 1 megabytes and 10 megabytes memory while making a buying decision for about 10 numbers of scope from two popular companies. The input to the scopes were the composite video signal from the DTV set top box. i found that the scope with 10 mb memory performed very well. I was able to see the Vertical and horizontal blanking periods easily by using the delay time base.The larger memory scope i was able to analyze the all the sync pulses,color burst,front porch and back porch.Any way the larger memory is always helpful in conjunction with the higher sampling rates.

t.alex
User Rank
Rookie
re: Oscilloscope memory depth: when bigger is not always better
t.alex   3/8/2012 3:16:14 PM
NO RATINGS
In fact Agilent scopes have been my favourite for long time.

old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Rookie
re: Oscilloscope memory depth: when bigger is not always better
old account Frank Eory   3/7/2012 10:07:41 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for this explanation of how sampling scopes work and how architecture affects performance. Very informative.

Most Recent Comments
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.