Breaking News
Design How-To

Oscilloscope memory depth: when bigger is not always better

NO RATINGS
2 saves
Page 1 / 3 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Threaded | Newest First | Oldest First
old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Author
re: Oscilloscope memory depth: when bigger is not always better
old account Frank Eory   3/7/2012 10:07:41 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for this explanation of how sampling scopes work and how architecture affects performance. Very informative.

t.alex
User Rank
Author
re: Oscilloscope memory depth: when bigger is not always better
t.alex   3/8/2012 3:16:14 PM
NO RATINGS
In fact Agilent scopes have been my favourite for long time.

agk
User Rank
Author
re: Oscilloscope memory depth: when bigger is not always better
agk   3/9/2012 6:21:13 AM
NO RATINGS
I used two scopes for the same application with 1 megabytes and 10 megabytes memory while making a buying decision for about 10 numbers of scope from two popular companies. The input to the scopes were the composite video signal from the DTV set top box. i found that the scope with 10 mb memory performed very well. I was able to see the Vertical and horizontal blanking periods easily by using the delay time base.The larger memory scope i was able to analyze the all the sync pulses,color burst,front porch and back porch.Any way the larger memory is always helpful in conjunction with the higher sampling rates.

Wing traces in the sky
User Rank
Author
re: Oscilloscope memory depth: when bigger is not always better
Wing traces in the sky   3/14/2012 5:48:54 AM
NO RATINGS
What's the waveform update rate when you set the scope memory depth or record length to 10M ? The maximum memory depth of scope available today is 2Gpts per channel,which is good for single shot analysis , but not for fast waveform update rate .

docdivakar
User Rank
Author
re: Oscilloscope memory depth: when bigger is not always better
docdivakar   3/14/2012 12:34:33 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for an informative article. @Rich Krajewski: good call, it would be nice to see a Youtube video version of this! MP Divakar

Michael.Lauterbach
User Rank
Author
re: Oscilloscope memory depth: when bigger is not always better
Michael.Lauterbach   3/21/2012 3:34:12 PM
NO RATINGS
To those of us who know oscilloscope architectures this piece is a thinly veiled attack by Agilent on Tektronix. I suppose from the writer's point of view that is worthwhile. But he ignores a few major points: 1. Most scopes these days have a fast update mode for when the user simply wants to view the data. 2. In some cases viewing the signal is enough but very often the user needs measurements. In this case the waveform needs to go to the CPU. The LeCroy X-Stream (extremely fast, streaming) architechture makes measurements much faster than other architectures.

caperiver1999@gmail.com
User Rank
Author
tables and graphs would be good
caperiver1999@gmail.com   5/27/2014 9:54:42 PM
NO RATINGS
Can you please add the tables and figures? Thought this might be a browser issue but the article doesn't seem to descriminate here.

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed