Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Design How-To

2D vs. 2.5D vs. 3D ICs 101

4/8/2012 04:08 PM EDT
29 comments
NO RATINGS
2 saves
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 3 / 3
Iacapital
User Rank
Author
re: 2D vs. 2.5D vs. 3D ICs 101
Iacapital   4/10/2012 5:58:29 PM
NO RATINGS
How could I make you another Sunday to keep writing good stuff like this? Coffee, Tea , or Me? Sorry, the humor should stop by coffee, tea, or money, definitely Not Me! Jimmy

Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Author
re: 2D vs. 2.5D vs. 3D ICs 101
Max The Magnificent   4/10/2012 12:50:19 PM
NO RATINGS
I must admit that I forgot to mention the whole concept of monolithic 3D ICs. I understand the concept, but I'm not well aware as to the nitty-gritty details, including how usable it is.

Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Author
re: 2D vs. 2.5D vs. 3D ICs 101
Max The Magnificent   4/10/2012 12:42:36 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks David

Or_Bach
User Rank
Author
re: 2D vs. 2.5D vs. 3D ICs 101
Or_Bach   4/10/2012 7:29:18 AM
NO RATINGS
Lets continue and detail that the 3D-IC space has two main type. The TSV base and the monolithic 3D. The TSV is in most cases stacking of wafer process independently, than one wafer is thin to about 50 micron and stack as a die or a wafer on top of another wafer, and than connected using TSV that are about 5 micron. While monolithic 3D will be about a fabricating additional layer of semiconductor of 100nm on top of previous processed wafer and continue the processing of transistors and interconnects. The monolithic 3D would provide 10,000x higher vertical connections than TSV. We can find more information on some monolithic 3D flow in http://www.monolithic3d.com

David Ashton
User Rank
Author
re: 2D vs. 2.5D vs. 3D ICs 101
David Ashton   4/10/2012 5:35:53 AM
NO RATINGS
Fascinating stuff and very good explanations - thanks Max.

Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Author
re: 2D vs. 2.5D vs. 3D ICs 101
Max The Magnificent   4/9/2012 9:02:15 PM
NO RATINGS
Arrggghhh -- now I'm kicking myself that I didn't mention this ... there's always something more, isn't there?

MikeSantarini
User Rank
Author
re: 2D vs. 2.5D vs. 3D ICs 101
MikeSantarini   4/9/2012 8:41:53 PM
NO RATINGS
Great piece, Max. I think this is truly a fascinating technology that can certainly benefit by more tutorial information like you have provided. In fact, it seems that above and beyond how it differs from SiP and MCMs, a lot of folks seem to get 2.5D and 3D IC stacking confused with what was traditionally called finfet technology but has been recently rebranded seemingly be Intel as "tri-gate" or "multigate" transistor technology. This of course could get even more confusing if and when folks actually start doing 3D stacking with finfet based devices. Cheers, Mike

Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Author
re: 2D vs. 2.5D vs. 3D ICs 101
Max The Magnificent   4/9/2012 7:40:20 PM
NO RATINGS
Actually, thanks to you for taking the time to comment -- I spent a lot of my Sunday writing this, so it's really nice to know that someone took the time to read it (grin)

nicu_p
User Rank
Author
re: 2D vs. 2.5D vs. 3D ICs 101
nicu_p   4/9/2012 6:31:54 PM
NO RATINGS
Very good 101 on the subject, thanks!

<<   <   Page 3 / 3
March 2015 Cartoon Caption Contest: Mountain Climbing
March 2015 Cartoon Caption Contest: Mountain Climbing
The mountain had formed millions of years before when two tektronix plates collided.
208 comments
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week