Breaking News
Design How-To

Microelectronic sensing system enables in-flight arrow ballistics measurement

Page 1 / 2 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Threaded | Newest First | Oldest First
gayatrikumar_1
User Rank
Author
re: Microelectronic sensing system enables in-flight arrow ballistics measurement
gayatrikumar_1   5/2/2012 9:25:59 PM
NO RATINGS
TI has released some FRAM based MSPs which are fast and could retain memory in the absence of power. I feel that they are suitable to improve this kind of applications. Are there any limitations to use them here ?

Badger5149
User Rank
Author
re: Microelectronic sensing system enables in-flight arrow ballistics measurement
Badger5149   3/29/2014 9:37:15 PM
NO RATINGS
  Very excited to see this, As a fligth shooter I have a very specific interest in the velocity of the arrow throughout its flight. Is there anyway I can talk to you about this? Steve Gardner

StevenHunter
User Rank
Author
re: Microelectronic sensing system enables in-flight arrow ballistics measurement
StevenHunter   5/3/2012 2:34:13 PM
NO RATINGS
I have made two arrow based systems. One was launched by a bow. It was a video camera and radio transmitter. The resulting video clearly shows the sky, the horizon, and then the rapidly approaching ground. Single stepping through shows blades of grass just before impact. The other system was a three-axis accelerometer designed to be lowered into very small diameter wells. I needed some high strength, small-diameter precision tubing. Being an archer, I realized than an arrow shaft would be cheap and perfect. Instead of paying $200 a foot for precision tubing, I could get a dozen arrow shafts for $50 (although our procurement department questioned what appeared to be non-work related items). Arrow shafts are 100,000 PSI tensile strength aluminum and are incredibly straight and uniform in wall thickness.

BicycleBill
User Rank
Author
re: Microelectronic sensing system enables in-flight arrow ballistics measurement
BicycleBill   5/3/2012 3:52:15 PM
NO RATINGS
Can you do a case-study on either one of your designs? My site FAQ tells you what we are looking for: http://www.eetimes.com/ContentEETimes/Documents/Schweber/FAQSept2010.pdf or email me: bill.schweber@ubm.com

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed