Breaking News
Design How-To

Extended scalability of perpendicular STT-MRAM towards sub-20-nm MTJ node

NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 2 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
resistion
User Rank
CEO
20 nm 6F^2?
resistion   1/28/2014 10:37:17 AM
NO RATINGS
Would a 6F^2 20 nm transistor be able to drive the perpendicular STT-MRAM?

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Extended scalability of perpendicular STT-MRAM towards sub-20-nm MTJ node
resistion   2/12/2013 3:00:09 PM
NO RATINGS
I think if you read an STT cell for a minute it would be disturbed. It's because read current is about a third of write current.

unknown multiplier
User Rank
Rookie
re: Extended scalability of perpendicular STT-MRAM towards sub-20-nm MTJ node
unknown multiplier   12/18/2012 3:35:56 AM
NO RATINGS
RA is too low for any foundry to support with their transistor.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Extended scalability of perpendicular STT-MRAM towards sub-20-nm MTJ node
resistion   7/25/2012 1:35:08 AM
NO RATINGS
This could be the reason PCM no longer hyped by Samsung.

Top Comments of the Week
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.
Flash Poll