Ever need a simple low power isolated housekeeping power supply and did not want to buy an off-the-shelf brick or module? A make-or-buy decision hinges on many factors, but simplicity, solution size, cost and performance weigh heavily on which way to go. A power supply with isolation from input to output is required for several types of applications including some medical systems.
Ground separation from a noisy source voltage is one reason for needing an isolated power supply especially in medical equipment. Exam cameras, dental instruments, sleep and vital sign monitors, to name a few, all use displays that can be adversely affected by a noisy source voltage. An isolated power supply provides ground separation that can eliminate noise causing display irregularities.
Larger medical systems like a CT scan, blood gas electrolyte analyzer and some ultrasound systems typically use a distributed power architecture due to multiple PC boards for various functions and normally distribute a 24V or 48V bus voltage throughout the system. Distributed power architectures usually require isolated DC/DC conversion from the bus to the subsystem operating voltages to enhance the reliability and for safety reasons. This type of bus voltage has the capability to supply a large amount of current and isolation is required to prevent a hazard that can be caused during a short-circuit fault condition.
Flyback converters have been widely used in isolated DC/DC applications for many years. However, they are not necessarily a designer’s first choice. Power supply designers unwillingly select a flyback converter out of necessity for lower power isolated requirements, not because they are easier to design. The flyback converter has stability issues due to the well-known right-half-plane zero in the control loop which is further complicated by the propagation delay, aging and gain variation of an optocoupler.
Furthermore, a flyback converter requires a significant amount of time devoted to the design of the transformer, a task further complicated by the normally limited selection of off-the-shelf transformers and the possible necessity for a custom transformer. Recent advances in power conversion technology have made lower power isolated converters much easier to design. Linear Technology’s recently released LT8300 isolated flyback converter solves many of these flyback design obstacles.
@ETmax of course the ordinary crowd does it with an isolated device off the secondary, that's what makes this novel. that's why this way is cool and cheaper. You can always regulated down from the 5v rail.
Krh, to answer your question:
1) 85% peak efficiency for 5V output and 87% peak efficiency for 12V output. A more detailed discussion can be found (http://cds.linear.com/docs/LT%20Journal/LTJournal-V22N3-06-df-LT8300-MinChen.pdf).
2) It does scale and you get better efficiency for higher output power. Check LTC's No-Opto Product Family.
Not a very new technique, but much more practical when integrated into the IC. My only gripe with this method is the accuracy obtainable. I tend to do the sensing on the secondary and then use the opto as a critical switch. You get better regulation and the opto plays less of a role in accuracy. Stability is still an issue of course, but it becomes the same for each unit built making it something you can deal with.
This is a clever design without the need for an opto coupler to sense the secondary side and to feed the primary side to regulate the secondary output.Many people will like to use this design even though the output load regulation is average.
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.