Breaking News
Design How-To

Combating fake chips by controlling supply chain

Fixing the problem
NO RATINGS
< Previous Page 2 / 3 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
DaveR1234
User Rank
Rookie
re: Combating fake chips by controlling supply chain
DaveR1234   10/25/2012 11:43:03 AM
NO RATINGS
"...it is estimated that 2 percent of all the semiconductors sold last year were counterfeit. That doesn’t sound too threatening.." Who with half a brain would think 2% counterfeit parts is not threatening?

Yippity
User Rank
Rookie
re: Combating fake chips by controlling supply chain
Yippity   10/25/2012 11:53:38 AM
NO RATINGS
No mention of the DLA's Generalized Emulation of Microcircuits (GEM) program which can provide a form, fit, and function replacement for non-available microcircuits using current design and processing technologies? The GEM contract was awarded to SRI International (Cage Code / 03652), perhaps an oversight ? With regard to "Some companies are working on developing sophisticated identification technologies that can be included in the production of components, but these are also extremely costly." That's hogwash. The DLA recently Mandated the use of botanical DNA marking for high risk chips. It works and it is not "extremely costly". All in all, a very self-serving article if you ask me.

elektryk321
User Rank
Rookie
re: Combating fake chips by controlling supply chain
elektryk321   10/25/2012 2:08:55 PM
NO RATINGS
I would just compare to cost of protection and the loss of income (or sth) due to counterfeit.

SylvieBarak
User Rank
Rookie
re: Combating fake chips by controlling supply chain
SylvieBarak   10/25/2012 5:01:19 PM
NO RATINGS
If you were in a helicopter that went down owing to a faulty counterfeit part, or the victim of a faulty counterfeit medical appliance, I'm sure you would see things differently. Sure, 2% doesn't sound like a lot to you... but it's a lot to the people it affects. And it's also just an estimate.

mondoe
User Rank
Rookie
re: Combating fake chips by controlling supply chain
mondoe   10/25/2012 11:58:29 PM
NO RATINGS
And the lack of mentioning that the min cost will be in the 10's if not 100's of thousands of $$ for the remanufacture !!. There are benefits to both !!.. Military and others need to make contigency for min 25-50% replacement (service) parts adn possibly even 100% relative to the cost of the product !!. Brokers will always have benefits but hte decision to use Broker (Grey Market) need to be made by experienced/educated decision makers not just the bottom of the run purchasing officer who does not understand the consequences of bad decisions !.

elektryk321
User Rank
Rookie
re: Combating fake chips by controlling supply chain
elektryk321   10/26/2012 8:46:17 AM
NO RATINGS
It is just simple calculation. Everyone is calculating the risk of failure, in a bicycles, cars and helicopters. Do you believe there are products 100% safe at any possible situation? If I was a victim of such situation, it will be big loss for me, but for manufacturer I am only number on the paper. Busines is cruel, sometime is cheaper to take some bigger risk and buy insurence in case of problems.

ddeisz208
User Rank
Rookie
re: Combating fake chips by controlling supply chain
ddeisz208   10/27/2012 3:06:21 AM
NO RATINGS
Yippity, No oversight at all. Rochester Electronics is well aware of the GEM program and most of the people running it. A part is not "GEM'-ed" and is not available to be "GEM-ed" if it is available by industry. That's a fact. It is only if a part is totally unavailable by an authorized source will the possibility of doing GEM be undertaken. Regarding your comment about DNA.....Get your facts straight, then come out to talk. Stop quoting the marketing hype and go get a quote for implementation. Figure out how expensive it would be to implement when your part marking is all laser in your current assembly process as it is for many OCM's. Hogwash indeed - ANY part marking strategy mandated onto the OCM's by the 1% market is half-baked at best. Rochester Electronics is doing something entirely unique here working with the OCM's on our Recreation/Replication strategy. It is an authorized method to get hard-to-get parts like ASICs where the only other choice is to redesign....in a newer technology....and that's not always a good thing to do. By the way, the GEM program is a good program, but is limited on how far it can go with technology. At some point, having no design archive makes GEMs impossible. Yippity - your comments show some additional research on your part was needed. Have at it. Dan Deisz Rochester Electronics

ddeisz208
User Rank
Rookie
re: Combating fake chips by controlling supply chain
ddeisz208   10/27/2012 3:12:41 AM
NO RATINGS
Mondoe, You make a very important fact, and it rarely gets implemented well. That is ordering enough spares/repairs capability baked into the funded portion of the program. It's a very difficult program for program managers on long-life programs (20+ years). They are only funded for so many years, but must somehow do all the last time buys to secure enough product. We have seen that the only way for this to change on those types of programs requires a very different mindset at the time of program award. While the author didn't mention pricing, let's assume your pricing ranges are correct. It can still be significantly cheaper to remanufacture product than redesign and qualify a product. Dan Deisz Rochester Electronics

ddeisz208
User Rank
Rookie
re: Combating fake chips by controlling supply chain
ddeisz208   10/27/2012 3:14:51 AM
NO RATINGS
Geez DaveR1234 - lighten up a bit. The author was just saying that the 2% number doesn't sound like a big number. Dan Deisz Rochester Electronics

kjdsfkjdshfkdshfvc
User Rank
Rookie
re: Combating fake chips by controlling supply chain
kjdsfkjdshfkdshfvc   10/27/2012 1:26:41 PM
NO RATINGS
More stuff I did not know. http://bit.ly/IC4m9t

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.