Breaking News
Design How-To

Ethernet tackles automotive EMI challenge

Handling radiated emissions
1/2/2013 10:23 PM EST
3 comments
NO RATINGS
< Previous Page 2 / 3 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Snick
User Rank
Rookie
re: Ethernet tackles automotive EMI challenge
Snick   1/9/2013 11:22:49 PM
NO RATINGS
10 Jan. 08:22 Japan time Your link to the second page here is broken.

jpmcwil
User Rank
Rookie
re: Ethernet tackles automotive EMI challenge
jpmcwil   1/16/2013 10:17:03 PM
NO RATINGS
I’ve been seeing more and more stuff about this lately. Just to put it out there- I think ethernet in the car is mostly a bad idea. The exception, where Ethernet in a vehicle might make sense, is as a communications interface to an on-vehicle diagnostic or programming gateway. This could help avoid needing a myriad of different service tools and special hardware interfaces to talk to various cars, or to the various systems on a single car. Yes, Unshielded Twisted Pair is fairly cheap, but the added MIPS and software required to support Ethernet protocol isn't going to come for free in auto silicon anytime soon. And BTW, OPEN isn't the only thing that can run on UTP or even other lower cost wiring options. Sure, everybody thinks Ethernet is great because of its ubiquity in home and business networks, but vehicles have very different requirements and needs than those applications. Sure, vehicles are getting a lot of technology, but they're still not a home office or media center, where a high level of interchangeability is required, and everything probably needs to talk to everything else.

jpmcwil
User Rank
Rookie
re: Ethernet tackles automotive EMI challenge
jpmcwil   1/16/2013 10:17:16 PM
NO RATINGS
What’s more, isn't the implementation of One-Pair-EtherNet (OPEN) basically a proprietary point-to-point physical layer, with a big 'ol bloated Ethernet protocol stack on top of it? There are a number of other efficient, vehicle–oriented P2P communication interfaces available, with HIGHER bandwidth, requiring much less overhead than is necessary to support “Ethernet.” I don’t think it will be practical to try connecting everything in a car together by “OPEN Ethernet” to the exclusion of such other reliable and inexpensive communications interfaces and proprietary protocols. There’s a lot of marketing hype over “ethernet in vehicles,” I just hope the vehicle OEMs don’t get sucked into it. Although acceptance may line the pockets of the OPEN Ethernet SIG, it doesn’t buy anybody else anything not already available more cheaply and efficiently in other ways. Sorry for the rant, at least in this article I didn't see anything about trying to use RJ-45 connectors, too. Where, in a vehicle, would an RJ-45 ever be suitable as a reliable, long term interconnect?!? lol.

August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.