Breaking News
Design How-To

Intel moves forward with European 450-mm project

3/29/2013 10:42 AM EDT
5 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
geekmaster
User Rank
Author
re: Intel moves forward with European 450-mm project
geekmaster   4/1/2013 5:34:38 PM
NO RATINGS
I think, 1.24 million Euro for Enable450 is way not enough - even intended to conduct "co-ordination and supporting" actions. Do the people work for free there?

daleste
User Rank
Author
re: Intel moves forward with European 450-mm project
daleste   4/2/2013 12:38:57 AM
NO RATINGS
I guess the budget is low because they will only be coordinating the effort. I guess the member companies will be footing the bill for the development.

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Author
re: Intel moves forward with European 450-mm project
Peter Clarke   4/2/2013 11:36:26 AM
NO RATINGS
Development is covered under other projects as I indicated in copy. The EEM450PR ?project on pilot line readiness, which began in February 2012 has a budget of 84 million euro (about $108 million) of which the European Commission is funding 14 million euro (about $18 million).

Nonoriri
User Rank
Author
re: Intel moves forward with European 450-mm project
Nonoriri   4/6/2013 1:20:50 PM
NO RATINGS
It's strange there's no European semiconductor company involved. Does it mean ST already consider it has no long term future ??? I guess it explains the limited funding. Why EC would found Intel that has no fab in Europe?

Mike@FH
User Rank
Author
re: Intel moves forward with European 450-mm project
Mike@FH   4/6/2013 8:18:18 PM
NO RATINGS
Intel and GlobalFoundries both have major state of the art fabs in Europe. One goal is to persuade them in due course to upgrade these to 450mm. In the meantime the imec 450mm pilot line currently in construction will be the most advanced 450mm facility once it is complete. We have already proposed a way in which ST could become involved in 450mm technology but they currently have alternative plans.

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed