Breaking News
Design How-To

Exploring photometry applications and trends

Pulse-oximeter trends
NO RATINGS
1 saves
< Previous Page 2 / 3 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Threaded | Newest First | Oldest First
EREBUS0
User Rank
Author
re: Exploring photometry applications and trends
EREBUS0   4/27/2013 9:07:09 PM
NO RATINGS
We have the technology to greatly enhance our medical care. What we lack is sufficient data security to keep unwanted people from exploiting that data for uses against others. So I am only luke warm on going forward with sensor development and data analysis until we can better protect the information. Just my opinion.

green_is_now
User Rank
Author
re: Exploring photometry applications and trends
green_is_now   4/28/2013 6:00:49 PM
NO RATINGS
Erubus, exactly, only with plug and play encription That can't be compromised by app or OS updates. Or at least OS updates need to be validated and only available to the carrier. A form of fire wall between the OS update system and other apps will be needed to insure this does not get exploited.

green_is_now
User Rank
Author
re: Exploring photometry applications and trends
green_is_now   4/28/2013 6:03:29 PM
NO RATINGS
I could see some insurance denial specailist on commision to using illigal data minimg to find out who he can srew over by refusing insurance coverage or raising rates on those they feel are high risk based on data mined.

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed