SAN FRANCISCO—Intel will build ICs and SoCs for Microsemi using its 22-nm FinFET process, Microsemi said Wednesday (May 1).
The foundry deal, signed in January, has allowed Microsemi to engage with customers and begin designs utilizing Intel's 22-nm process technology with product delivery expected to begin in late 2014 or early 2015, Microsemi (Aliso Viejo, Calif.) said.
Microsemi—which offers a broad range of chips for communications, defense, aerospace and industrial markets—becomes Intel's fifth publicly disclosed foundry customer, joining network processor provider Netronome and FPGA vendors Altera, Achronix and Tabula.
Intel reportedly has several more undisclosed foundry customers. Unconfirmed reports have said Intel could be making 22-nm ASICs for Cisco. Others said the PC chip giant may be working on a deal to make mobile processors for Apple, which is trying to reduce its foundry dependence on archrival Samsung.
Intel is not generally believed to be interested in becoming a broad provider of foundry services. Len Jelinek, a chief analyst at IHS iSuppli, told EE Times in February that Intel's foundry strategy is to select a few high volume customers provide Intel with an additional revenue stream to help offset the cost of its advanced manufacturing capability.
Intel President and CEO said during the company's first quarter earnings call that the Intel's business model for foundry is to go after customers that can most benefit from the company's industry-leading process technology and are prepared to pay for it. Areas such as communications processors and programmable logic are prime examples of products that can benefit greatly from the most advanced technology available.
"The business model that we have for the foundry assumes value based pricing," Otellini said. "The people that we are soliciting and people that are attracted to us are those who see the advantages of our technology as it manifests itself in their products and gives them an advantage in the marketplace. So it’s a healthy business for us."
Paul Pickle, executive vice president of Microsemi's Integrated Circuits group, said through a statement that the high-value applications Microsemi addresses require chips with unique performance and complex functional attributes.
"Using Intel's innovative process technology and silicon-proven IP will enable us to expand our opportunity in the markets we serve with higher-performance, lower-power digital ICs for the communications and defense markets," Pickle said.
Intel's FinFET technology—called 3-D tri-gate transistors by Intel—is said to offer very high power efficiency and performance.
Intel also said during its first quarter earnings call that it shipped its first silicon to a foundry customer during the first quarter.
IDM based Foundry usually leave concerns to customers(could be competitors also). For Intel, there is IP conflict ahead. It also would take a while for Intel to fit into customers' specific requests or customers fit into Intel's specific offerings.
@resistion: i'm not sure intel is competitive at lower nodes(or else it would have offered them by now).
But if intel does find a way to compete at older nodes, it could really hurt tsmc who made most of revenues/profits from older nodes.
Intel as well as AMD used trailing /depreciated capacity to make NOR flash .
AMD spun off Spansion and I believe Intel sold NOR to MU.
No reason why Intel can not apply this strategy to the foundry biz - Intel already has mature yields on 22nm TriGate while TSMC et al are scrambling to provide their FinFet solutions to market.
My guess is there will an Intel foundry business unit emerging that will be focused on winning
NON ARM foundry business - business that won't compromise Intel's core business
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.