Breaking News
Design How-To

ARM aims at mid-range with three processors

Bringing GPU-compute to the mid-range
6/3/2013 09:25 AM EDT
8 comments
NO RATINGS
< Previous Page 2 / 2
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
re: ARM aims at mid-range with three processors
Peter Clarke   6/7/2013 5:16:08 PM
NO RATINGS
ARM seems to be positioninng the A12-T622 against the A57-T628, and the A53-T450 combinations for mobile SoCs. To judge from the ARM-supplied slide the Cortex-A15's days for design-in in mobile device market have come and gone. But does that means a flood of Cortex-A15 based devices are about to hit the market or the Cortex-A15 has come up empty?

sw guy
User Rank
Manager
re: ARM aims at mid-range with three processors
sw guy   6/7/2013 11:03:53 AM
NO RATINGS
You make me think that ARM may have discovered that A15 was to be skipped, hence the A12. BTW, ARM in is better shape than Intel in case of getting out a somewhat bad model: no G$ invested in own factory allows to quickly divert ugly duck and build a new reference more in line with customers expectations.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: ARM aims at mid-range with three processors
resistion   6/7/2013 7:50:33 AM
NO RATINGS
Intel has been getting some design wins but performance doesn't matter much in mobile, at least not like how it did with PCs. In that case, there was tradeoff, but with mobile, if performance means too much power, there is a high possibility the performance would be skipped. Especially when performance is usually associated with two-handed applications.

help.fulguy
User Rank
Manager
re: ARM aims at mid-range with three processors
help.fulguy   6/3/2013 6:21:47 PM
NO RATINGS
ARM is losing Power battle to Intel. Intel is everywhere on new Android product announcements. Cortex-A15 is a whopper on power. 6W for Dual Core A15 is too much. ARM had to do something. Hence, A12! Lower Power on A12 means crappy performance. Intel will squish ARM

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
re: ARM aims at mid-range with three processors
Peter Clarke   6/3/2013 4:47:45 PM
NO RATINGS
@Chipmonk They are not die photos for three different SoCs. They are the same image. But ARM indicates the sizes of the rectangles are indicative of relative die areas for A57-T628, A12-T622 and A53-T450 mobile SoCs

chipmonk0
User Rank
CEO
re: ARM aims at mid-range with three processors
chipmonk0   6/3/2013 3:49:34 PM
NO RATINGS
Are those die photos validated ? If so the die size could range from 11 mm sq. for the Premium market down to just 5 mm sq. for the Entry level version,or in terms of area just 20 %. Does ARM's royalty fee scale with area or with functional blocks ?

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
re: ARM aims at mid-range with three processors
Peter Clarke   6/3/2013 3:06:19 PM
NO RATINGS
@eewiz Die area as indicated in the top illustration. Having said that each of the A9, A12 and A15 can be traded off for power, performance and area. But in general the A15 offers greater performance but at greater area cost. It is also possible that ARM is prepared to cut a deal on the royalty rate seeking a higher percentage of a higher priced SoC. However as typical royalty rates are about 2 percent of the SOC selling price that won't make a lot of difference.

eewiz
User Rank
CEO
re: ARM aims at mid-range with three processors
eewiz   6/3/2013 11:48:31 AM
NO RATINGS
What could be difference in production costs using an A-15 vs A-12 CPU?

August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.