Breaking News
Design How-To

Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs

Additional notes and comments
6/12/2013 11:53 AM EDT
94 comments
NO RATINGS
< Previous Page 2 / 2
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 9 / 10   >   >>
rajgarg
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
rajgarg   6/12/2013 7:16:37 PM
NO RATINGS
How is this not an ARM-paid comment?

Wilco1
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
Wilco1   6/12/2013 7:12:42 PM
NO RATINGS
Looks like Intel-paid marketing. Atom has lower CPU performance than the old Cortex-A9, and is far surpassed by Cortex-A15. Yet in this particular test Atom magically beats A15?

Jack.L
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
Jack.L   6/12/2013 5:41:12 PM
NO RATINGS
Pretty significant results from the Intel camp. I am not pro or against Intel, but this will have some impact on the naysayers out there. Unless ARM or Qualcomm et. all can make some really fast improvements in power consumption versus processor power, they could take some big hits in sales. I would be wary of my Qualcomm stock holdings.

Jack.L
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
Jack.L   6/12/2013 5:38:37 PM
NO RATINGS
The comparison was against the two types of processors in the Samsung S4, one of the most recently introduced phones based on ARM processors and one of the fastest ARM based units on the market. I don't know why you would not consider that a fair comparison?

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
Peter Clarke   6/12/2013 3:17:19 PM
NO RATINGS
@eewiz It was a typo, now corrected to read Z2580. Thanks for catching.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
resistion   6/12/2013 2:47:19 PM
NO RATINGS
32 nm, not trigate yet.

bennetmei
User Rank
Freelancer
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
bennetmei   6/12/2013 2:23:27 PM
NO RATINGS
Software? Is user experience really the same using Android apps on x86?

eewiz
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
eewiz   6/12/2013 2:07:44 PM
NO RATINGS
It's a typo in the first line.. must be Z2580 instead of Z2850.

bennetmei
User Rank
Freelancer
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
bennetmei   6/12/2013 2:04:42 PM
NO RATINGS
Lenovo K900

eewiz
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung ICs
eewiz   6/12/2013 2:03:57 PM
NO RATINGS
BTW does this chip uses, the 3D trigate process? Process advantage finally showing up for Intel...

<<   <   Page 9 / 10   >   >>
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.