Breaking News
Product How-To

ARM's low end undercut by Andes core

4/17/2013 04:01 PM EDT
15 comments
NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 2 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
przemek
User Rank
Rookie
re: ARM's low end undercut by Andes core
przemek   6/11/2013 7:35:17 PM
NO RATINGS
Considering that there are free cores available, Andes has to offer a compelling value, presumably in system integration, peripherals, software tools and other ecosystem facilities. It'd be interesting to see how well they'll succeed in that---Far Eastern companies do not yet have a big track record in creating open communities and ecosystems.

chanj0
User Rank
CEO
re: ARM's low end undercut by Andes core
chanj0   4/23/2013 7:45:39 AM
NO RATINGS
This is a very interesting core. I am keen to learn more about it. I'm quite surprise that there are only bluetooth controller's and touchscreen controller's vendors interested.

John Cooper
User Rank
Rookie
re: ARM's low end undercut by Andes core
John Cooper   4/22/2013 7:22:18 PM
NO RATINGS
Cost, cost, cost.... then code-density will be even more key than licensing cost. I suspect a couple of kB of extra on-chip memory will quickly erase the 1-2% of royalties metionned above by Eewiz. Andes seems to be the only provider of tools for his processor, can the code size be really be as optimizied as the one of the big names like IAR, Green-Hills and all the others that compete for the Cortex family? BTW, I find it weak to resume the story about "better DMIPS and lower cost". It's no secret it is easy to tweak DMIPS (which version?, inlining on?) and cost will be surely be all about negociation. Now please Mr Journalists and Analysts, what about real investigation on what is really important for deep embedded systems? * certified "difficult to tweak" CoreMark? * what about interrupt latency or nesting? * extra debug goodies like trace? * what about family concept and compatibility with the other Andes processors? Please don't treat embedded topics as you would cover apps processors. Catchy title is always good, content is even better ;-)!

John Cooper
User Rank
Rookie
re: ARM's low end undercut by Andes core
John Cooper   4/22/2013 6:48:37 PM
NO RATINGS
To Duane: you can get Cortex-M0/M0+ based MCU now for much less than 0.50$ from NXP (LPC800), Freescale (KL series), ST (STM32F0). Even Infineon announced on Embedded World 0.25EUR for their XMC1000. There is not so much gap to go lower ;-)!

Duane Benson
User Rank
Blogger
re: ARM's low end undercut by Andes core
Duane Benson   4/22/2013 4:05:03 PM
NO RATINGS
My first thought was that if an ARM Cortex M0 can be purchased for under a dollar in quantity, there's not a lot of room for undercutting. But then I thought more about the "Internet of Things." When connected embedded systems are being added to products that sell retail for, say $10.00, the difference between $0.80 and $0.40 starts to matter. When building an embedded system into something half that retail price, that same difference will likely be the determinant factor as to possible or impossible. I'm real interested in seeing where Andes prices their MCUs.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: ARM's low end undercut by Andes core
rick merritt   4/22/2013 2:55:29 PM
NO RATINGS
Good question. I am all ears for anyone who cares to share ARM and Andes pricing information.

eewiz
User Rank
CEO
re: ARM's low end undercut by Andes core
eewiz   4/21/2013 11:40:52 AM
NO RATINGS
“Given what ARM is charging, I wouldn’t be surprised if you could cut your costs in half or more” using the Andes cores, said Linley Gwennap, principal of market watcher The Linley Group (Mountain View, Calif.). hmm.. how much is ARM charging per chip.. IINW, the royalties are less than 1~2% which I feel is pretty low already.

DMcCunney
User Rank
CEO
re: ARM's low end undercut by Andes core
DMcCunney   4/20/2013 2:52:14 PM
NO RATINGS
The key part for me was “Given what ARM is charging, I wouldn’t be surprised if you could cut your costs in half or more” As usual, it's about the money. The Andes core can be had for less in licensing costs than an equivalent ARM core, and there are relentless cost pressures in the semi-conductor market. Is the Andes core as good as ARM? It doesn't matter. The proper question is "Is it good *enough* for the job to which it will be applied?". It appears an assortment of customers think it is. I don't see ARM exactly quaking in their boots. They have a commanding position in various segments of the market, so their question will likely be "Do we cut licensing costs to preserve and possibly extend market share?" That will depend upon what they believe the net effect on revenues and profits will be from doing it.

Jiwon.Kim
User Rank
Rookie
re: ARM's low end undercut by Andes core
Jiwon.Kim   4/20/2013 12:46:06 AM
NO RATINGS
I'm heavy ARM user, but I think the success key is the easiness to understand then to use, and the price. We already have many option about performance, power and extendability to choose core, not saying only ARM. Old engineers tend to use their favorite core. Almost young engineers like new cores, normally student. So Easiness. And they should survive until these young engineers grow up. So Price. I think ARM Cortex series is already too complex, even for M series.

TarraTarra!
User Rank
CEO
re: ARM's low end undercut by Andes core
TarraTarra!   4/19/2013 4:50:12 PM
NO RATINGS
In the very low end MCUs where this will get used, it is more than just the CPU - it is the subsytem around it including interrupts, low power features, interface to embedded flash and the software tool chain and ecosystem. ARM is hard to beat in this area. The only advantage as Linley points out to Andes it the cost. This will keep ARM honest and that is always good for the market.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Most Recent Comments
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.