Breaking News
Product How-To

ARM's low end undercut by Andes core

4/17/2013 04:01 PM EDT
15 comments
NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 2 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
Duane Benson
User Rank
Blogger
re: ARM's low end undercut by Andes core
Duane Benson   4/22/2013 4:05:03 PM
NO RATINGS
My first thought was that if an ARM Cortex M0 can be purchased for under a dollar in quantity, there's not a lot of room for undercutting. But then I thought more about the "Internet of Things." When connected embedded systems are being added to products that sell retail for, say $10.00, the difference between $0.80 and $0.40 starts to matter. When building an embedded system into something half that retail price, that same difference will likely be the determinant factor as to possible or impossible. I'm real interested in seeing where Andes prices their MCUs.

John Cooper
User Rank
Rookie
re: ARM's low end undercut by Andes core
John Cooper   4/22/2013 6:48:37 PM
NO RATINGS
To Duane: you can get Cortex-M0/M0+ based MCU now for much less than 0.50$ from NXP (LPC800), Freescale (KL series), ST (STM32F0). Even Infineon announced on Embedded World 0.25EUR for their XMC1000. There is not so much gap to go lower ;-)!

John Cooper
User Rank
Rookie
re: ARM's low end undercut by Andes core
John Cooper   4/22/2013 7:22:18 PM
NO RATINGS
Cost, cost, cost.... then code-density will be even more key than licensing cost. I suspect a couple of kB of extra on-chip memory will quickly erase the 1-2% of royalties metionned above by Eewiz. Andes seems to be the only provider of tools for his processor, can the code size be really be as optimizied as the one of the big names like IAR, Green-Hills and all the others that compete for the Cortex family? BTW, I find it weak to resume the story about "better DMIPS and lower cost". It's no secret it is easy to tweak DMIPS (which version?, inlining on?) and cost will be surely be all about negociation. Now please Mr Journalists and Analysts, what about real investigation on what is really important for deep embedded systems? * certified "difficult to tweak" CoreMark? * what about interrupt latency or nesting? * extra debug goodies like trace? * what about family concept and compatibility with the other Andes processors? Please don't treat embedded topics as you would cover apps processors. Catchy title is always good, content is even better ;-)!

chanj0
User Rank
Manager
re: ARM's low end undercut by Andes core
chanj0   4/23/2013 7:45:39 AM
NO RATINGS
This is a very interesting core. I am keen to learn more about it. I'm quite surprise that there are only bluetooth controller's and touchscreen controller's vendors interested.

przemek
User Rank
Rookie
re: ARM's low end undercut by Andes core
przemek   6/11/2013 7:35:17 PM
NO RATINGS
Considering that there are free cores available, Andes has to offer a compelling value, presumably in system integration, peripherals, software tools and other ecosystem facilities. It'd be interesting to see how well they'll succeed in that---Far Eastern companies do not yet have a big track record in creating open communities and ecosystems.

<<   <   Page 2 / 2
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
Join our online Radio Show on Friday 11th July starting at 2:00pm Eastern, when EETimes editor of all things fun and interesting, Max Maxfield, and embedded systems expert, Jack Ganssle, will debate as to just what is, and is not, and embedded system.
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week