Breaking News
Product News

Cypress release PSoC Creator 2.0

9/22/2011 07:58 PM EDT
2 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
DrFPGA
User Rank
Blogger
re: Cypress release PSoC Creator 2.0
DrFPGA   9/24/2011 3:15:40 AM
NO RATINGS
There seem to be alot of applications that don't require 168MHz and the PSoC parts have been around long enough to make the Triscend disease unlikely. I do like the fact that the tools are integrating TOWARD the IDE and away from the FPGA place and route flows.

jg_
User Rank
Rookie
re: Cypress release PSoC Creator 2.0
jg_   9/22/2011 10:56:03 PM
NO RATINGS
There are also downsides to the 'all things to all users' approach : The PSoC Creator build times are glacial - there are so many software jugglers involved. The IP components may be flexible, but sadly they too are rather slow. Their specs give 15MHz for 16 bit counters. This beta (select customers only) release of v2.0 claims 20% better routing, but that's only 18MHz... Contrast that with a STM32F4, which claims 168MHz 32 bit counters (and much more Flash/Ram/CPU/FPU for similar prices...) There also seems to be a significant silicon cost to the 'all things' approach. PSoC parts are not cheap, and may yet suffer the FPSlic/Triscend disease. It is looking faster and cheaper, to deploy two focused parts.

Most Recent Comments
Sanjib.A
 
mhrackin
 
junko.yoshida
 
C VanDorne
 
Anatole Besplemennov
 
junko.yoshida
 
TonyTib
 
AZskibum
 
junko.yoshida
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
Join our online Radio Show on Friday 11th July starting at 2:00pm Eastern, when EETimes editor of all things fun and interesting, Max Maxfield, and embedded systems expert, Jack Ganssle, will debate as to just what is, and is not, and embedded system.
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week