Breaking News
News & Analysis

Global Chip Sales Buoyed by Phones, Memories

7/1/2013 12:20 PM EDT
4 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Peter Clarke
User Rank
Author
Re: Samsung?
Peter Clarke   7/2/2013 9:35:42 AM
NO RATINGS
Although I havent travelled in China my understanding is that there are several indigenous brands, well known there, appropriately priced and in some senses "cooler" than Apple and Samsung.

I imagine it is bit like prestige automobiles in the west.


We may all covet Rolls Royce, Bentley, Aston Martin, (name your expensive italian racing car). We may know they are coolest cars, but when it comes to buying a car most of us ower our sights.

 

 

kelleydferg
User Rank
Author
Re: Samsung?
kelleydferg   7/2/2013 9:10:44 AM
NO RATINGS
Interesting. The big untapped markets seem to be the developing countries that have some of wireless infrastructure in place but people can't afford a $100-$200 mobile phone. Samsung and Apple are going to have to react or leave the door open to other players. 

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Author
Re: Samsung?
Peter Clarke   7/2/2013 7:50:11 AM
NO RATINGS
Well Bruce Diesen didn't give a reason.

But anecdotally I am hearing that the tide is starting to turn against prestige brands because of the massive sales of entry-level and medium-level smartphones and tablets in the developing world.

In essence we are getting to the point where everyone who can afford and wants an iPhone or Galaxy S has been sold one. The people left who haven't been sold one but want one find it hard to justify the cost but ARE buying lower priced alternatives.

It's a theory.

kelleydferg
User Rank
Author
Samsung?
kelleydferg   7/2/2013 7:44:52 AM
NO RATINGS
Why the sluggish sales for Samsung? 

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed