Breaking News
News & Analysis

SRC, Intel Shrink Environmental Footprint of Chip Building

7/16/2013 09:50 AM EDT
6 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Threaded | Newest First | Oldest First
mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Blogger
Going green
mcgrathdylan   7/16/2013 1:53:22 PM
NO RATINGS
There's no getting around the fact that chip building is not exactly an environmentally friendly industry. I think we should applaud the development of any technology that can offset that, even in a small way.

Tom Murphy
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Going green
Tom Murphy   7/16/2013 4:49:37 PM
NO RATINGS
Hear, hear! SRC is doing important work here.  The industry already has a well-deserved black eye for its impact on the groundwater of Silicon Valley.  Environmental planning must become the part of any future chipmaking effort that hopes to be considered a success. End of story.

R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Going green
R_Colin_Johnson   7/16/2013 6:16:32 PM
NO RATINGS
SRC's Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing efforts are exemplary of what responsible chip makers should be doing. The effort is also researching all types of "greener" chemistries to clean up chip making further:

SRC funds green chemistry hunt


 

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Going green
Peter Clarke   7/17/2013 11:04:45 AM
NO RATINGS
And then there are those companies that put "green" in the naming of any product to take as much marketing benefit as possible.

So a memory that uses a little bit less energy to store a bit than some other memory becomes a "Green Memory"

 

Frank Eory
User Rank
CEO
Re: Going green
Frank Eory   7/17/2013 1:57:50 PM
NO RATINGS
Peter, don't you think "green" is an analog quantity and that every little bit helps? Perhaps they should use the word "greener" to indicate improvement. Whether it is reducing the quantity of gases used in IC manufacturing or a memory that uses a little bit less energy than its predecessors, these are all good things, and I don't mind that the PR guys like to point that out when a change is made that means less environmental impact or energy use.

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Going green
Peter Clarke   7/18/2013 8:17:54 AM
NO RATINGS
Hi Frank

Yes i do agree.

Every little bit helps.

But with comparative markting what you compare against is the trick.

 

So memory geometry and energy/bit have been reducing for years as a natural consequence of Moore's law miniaturization. I would argue that for an engineering audience this "downward escalator" is a built-in assumption.

And bear in mind the per bit energy needs to reduce because we keep choosing multimedia standards and applications that require more and more bits.

To say that the y generation memory consumes less per bit than the x generation memory and is therefore "green" seems to be a stretch. If very specific other things were done to make the compoment greener, reduce its carbon footprint during manufacture etc, I would better relate to the green label.

 

But yes every little bit helps....and the software programmers also need to understand that.

 

 

 

Top Comments of the Week
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.
Flash Poll