Breaking News
Quantum Entanglement Made Visible
7/24/2013

Nicolas Gisin, the co-founder of the first successful company based on quantum technologies, ID Quantique, reveals the first macroscopic example of quantum entanglement.
Nicolas Gisin, the co-founder of the first successful company based on quantum technologies, ID Quantique, reveals the first macroscopic example of quantum entanglement.

Return to Article

View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
tvhiggins
User Rank
Author
Re: Non-Quantum Photon Detector?
tvhiggins   7/30/2013 5:04:06 PM
NO RATINGS
I should probably just read Gisin's experimental work directly, because it's not clear to me from your article exactly how the photon state (or even what state) is being determined.

Your explanation of a classical detector appears to imply the quantum-classical boundary, where quantum decoherence occurs. Perhaps you're describing macroscopic (multi-photon) detection vs. microscopic (single-photon) detection. Using a simple interferometer, for example, one can detect the average polarization state of mulitple photons by simply observing the fringes caused by constructive and destructive interference among the photons.

Nevertheless, any light detector--photodetectors, human eyes, or photographic film--is a quantum detector, by definition, because detection can only be accomplished through quantum absorption (or capture) at the atomic level. It doesn't matter whether it's a single photon or millions of them.

R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Author
Re: Semantics
R_Colin_Johnson   7/30/2013 4:22:28 PM
NO RATINGS
I doubt it will lead to teleportation as transportation, but here is a YouTube video to watch: 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNvfpEjxNXQ

R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Author
Re: Non-Quantum Photon Detector?
R_Colin_Johnson   7/30/2013 4:07:00 PM
NO RATINGS
By entangling thousands of photons simultaneously, they become visible to any classical detector, which includes both photo-detectors and the naked eye.

selinz
User Rank
Author
Semantics
selinz   7/27/2013 6:15:12 PM
NO RATINGS
Is this simply doping of a direct bandgap material (not so uncommon) or some fancy smancy new thing that will ultimately lead to teleportation, a la Star Trek! Seems like a bit more info would be helpful. Anyone got a link to point to a bit more detail?

DrFPGA
User Rank
Author
Re: First Successful Company?
DrFPGA   7/26/2013 1:36:21 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanx for the additional info. Customers are good to have...

R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Author
Re: First Successful Company?
R_Colin_Johnson   7/26/2013 1:21:31 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes, ID Quantique has customers, although not as many as they would like (the recession hit the financial community just as they were getting started which nixed their original business model, which was to get banks as customers for securing financial transactions). However, they still have more customers that the second successful quantum technology company, D-Wave (which only has Google, NASA and Lockheed).

tvhiggins
User Rank
Author
Re: Non-Quantum Photon Detector?
tvhiggins   7/25/2013 3:00:46 PM
NO RATINGS
If "any conventional photodiode" is a "classical" detector, then all photodiode detectors must also be quantum detectors, since they only work through quantum processes. My question remains unanswered: What is a non-quantum detector?

DrFPGA
User Rank
Author
First Successful Company?
DrFPGA   7/25/2013 2:51:26 PM
NO RATINGS
I'm not sure what it means for them to be called the 'first successful quantum technology company'?

Do they have sales?

 

R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Author
Re: Non-Quantum Photon Detector?
R_Colin_Johnson   7/25/2013 2:51:19 PM
NO RATINGS
Any conventional photodiode is a "classical" detector.

steve@ritec
User Rank
Author
Re: NG Technology Advancement
steve@ritec   7/24/2013 8:34:00 PM
NO RATINGS
Relax. A few pounds would yield a few billion devices per person.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed