Breaking News
News & Analysis

Rambus Focuses on Products, Not Patents

8/12/2013 12:00 PM EDT
12 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Blogger
Encouraging
mcgrathdylan   8/12/2013 1:59:28 PM
NO RATINGS
It's encouraging to read this. I think focusing on products rather than pursuing a strategy that has Rambus labeled as a "patent troll" is a good direction for the company. I like the statement that there is not much difference between Rambus and ARM. Years ago I think that was true, but in recent years the companies seem to have pursued very different paths. I hope this is a sign that Rambus will indeed be more like ARM as time goes on.

krisi
User Rank
CEO
happy to hear
krisi   8/12/2013 2:09:36 PM
NO RATINGS
I am really happy to hear that...so many companies are trying to derive value from licensing that is somnewhat refreshing that someone actually wants to build products...good luck Rambus!

rick merritt
User Rank
Blogger
Perception and reality
rick merritt   8/12/2013 2:38:15 PM
NO RATINGS
Interesting neew direction.

At a recent meeting lunch meeting of licensing executives in Silicon Valley, Rambus was listed as one of the top five non-practicing entities by revenue, so they are definitely seen as a patent, not a product company.

Sheetal.Pandey
User Rank
Manager
Re: happy to hear
Sheetal.Pandey   8/12/2013 2:42:45 PM
NO RATINGS
Thats a good move by RAMBUS. Patent game is a distraous game unless your pockets are deep and you have the right lawyers.

krisi
User Rank
CEO
good move?
krisi   8/12/2013 2:51:52 PM
NO RATINGS
Whether that is actaully good move financially that remains to be seen...but at least this is a good move for my engineering soul ;-)

docdivakar
User Rank
Manager
Re: Rambus Focuses on Products, Not Patents
docdivakar   8/12/2013 4:41:23 PM
NO RATINGS
Good move indeed. How ever, emulating an ARM-like business model will take changes to both R&D and marketing for Rambus. Licensing patents vs. Silicon-verified IP does take more R&D investment for the latter.

MP Divakar

daleste
User Rank
CEO
Re: good move?
daleste   8/12/2013 9:57:11 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes, I agree.  Having products to sell is always a better position than licensing IP.  You don't need as many lawyers.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Which "products"?
junko.yoshida   8/12/2013 10:54:16 PM
NO RATINGS
Rambus' plan to diversify its business beyond memory technology has been put in place since more than a few yearsa ago.

First, it started with lighting and display technology (see details below)

http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1264103

and then, Cryptography Research Inc. was also added a couple of years ago.



Now, image sensors, etc.

It is not clear to me that with such diversified technology fields Rambus seems interested in today, which ones will become Rambus' flagship products vs IP licesning.

 

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Which "products"?
Peter Clarke   8/13/2013 5:10:26 AM
NO RATINGS
Junko

 

I think you are right.

It may well be that Rambus will be looking for some strategic options for some of its technologies while looking for others that hang together well.

For example, I can imagine a synergy between memory interfaces, cryptographic protection, digital rights management and image computation. Light bulbs and displays seem to be in a different camp.

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
Re: happy to hear
Peter Clarke   8/13/2013 5:19:44 AM
NO RATINGS
Rambus has signed some very big deals and achieved some very big settlements over the years.

In general it's patent licensing play would seem to have been successful BUT it is hard to build a relationship with customers through the confrontational legal system AND such settlements are "lumpy" which can be frightening for shareholders.

I think Ron Black has decided that it is better to be collaborative and take a little bit less out of the customers at each licensing bite but win repeat business, just like ARM.

But he also has to decide in which markets to play as a product or service provider and in which markets to be an IP licensor. You can't do both in the same market at risk of competing with your customers.

 

 

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week