Design Con 2015
Breaking News
News & Analysis

Adapteva Launches PUP

8/12/2013 01:45 PM EDT
8 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
vsnyder
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Following Wintel and others
vsnyder   10/9/2013 3:05:59 PM
NO RATINGS
The tool usually used for parallel programming these days is MPI, and before that, PVM.  As Rick points out, these are cumbersome to use.  Cray developed a much simpler system for use in Fortran, called coarrays, starting in about 1992.  It's been part of the Fortran standard since 2008.  Its simplicity has served as the model for UPC, X10 and Chapel, which aren't part of any standard.  The coarray features of Fortran are described unofficially in ftp://ftp.nag.co.uk/sc22wg5/N1801-N1850/N1824.pdf.  The draft of the Fortran 2008 standard that was ballotted by ISO is at http://j3-fortran.org/doc/standing/links/007.pdf.

kfield
User Rank
Blogger
Re: What would/will you do?
kfield   8/21/2013 11:03:24 AM
NO RATINGS
Andreas would be a cool keynote at DESIGN West!  What do others think?

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Following Wintel and others
rick merritt   8/12/2013 9:25:07 PM
NO RATINGS
In its own small way, startup Adapteva is joining giants such as Intel, Microsoft, Nvidia, AMD and others have been funding university work on parallel programming for many years.

Multicore processors need new parallel programming tools if they are to be used effectively. Despite years of research into massively parallel supercomputers, simple tools never emerged. One more shoulder, however small, pushing in this direction is always welcome.

LarryM99
User Rank
CEO
Re: What would/will you do?
LarryM99   8/12/2013 6:17:26 PM
NO RATINGS
Max:

I checked out the link, and I will be interested in seeing how his work progresses. I took a class at UCSD Extension a few years ago from Bart Kosko, one of the bright you guys in the connectionist school of thought in neural networks. I didn't get very far at the time, and eventually I set it aside, but I have come back to it from time to time. This is a good enough platform for this that I am tempted to drag out my old textbook and try some things out. I'll let you know if I come up with anything.

Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Blogger
Re: What would/will you do?
Max The Magnificent   8/12/2013 4:46:13 PM
NO RATINGS
@LarryM99: If you do use the Parallella for these applications, I'd love to hear how you get on -- especially the neural network one -- are you familiar with the work Robin Findley is doing with Neural Networks and FPGAs? (Click Here for more details)

LarryM99
User Rank
CEO
Re: What would/will you do?
LarryM99   8/12/2013 4:40:49 PM
NO RATINGS
I am keeping this in mind for two different applications. It should be a natural platform for neural network experimentation. I played around with that a while back and I mioght try it again on this platform. The small size of the memory for individual computing elements and the communication capability should work very well for that.

The other thing I might try is Software Defined Radio. Signal processing in the digital domain is a large part of what that is all about, and this platform could potentially do some very interesting things in terms of frequency adaptation and signal extraction.

Both of these applications have people working them in the forums on the site. It's comforting to have some company when you go wandering in the uncharted wilderness...

krisi
User Rank
CEO
great story
krisi   8/12/2013 2:36:16 PM
NO RATINGS
Great story...good luck Adapteva!

Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Blogger
What would/will you do?
Max The Magnificent   8/12/2013 1:56:36 PM
NO RATINGS
Have you ordered a Parallella supercomputer?

If so, what do you plan on doing with it?

If not, what would you do with one if you had one?

Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week