Breaking News
News & Analysis

Facebook Preps Switch, Taps Atom SoC

8/12/2013 07:50 PM EDT
13 comments
NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 2 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Ready for SDN?
rick merritt   8/12/2013 8:23:05 PM
NO RATINGS
Google is, Facebook is. How about you?

JanineLove
User Rank
Author
Cert Lab
JanineLove   8/13/2013 9:14:48 AM
NO RATINGS
"Taiwan's Industrial Technology Research Institute has agreed to set up the first certification lab. Space could be ready in a few weeks, though test suites will take longer to complete."

>>I'd like to hear more about this.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: Cert Lab
rick merritt   8/13/2013 10:59:42 AM
NO RATINGS
@Janine: Makes sense. A lot of the server design and manufacturing for the Facebooks, Amazons and Google';s of the world comes from Taiwan ODMs these days with Quanta one of the leaders. Taiwan has wanted a bigger footprint in clpoud comp0uting for awhile. ITRI has a division focusing on cloud issues, too.

ITRI is clearing space right now and is out ahead of the team preparing the testing software.

 

 

Sheetal.Pandey
User Rank
Author
Re: Cert Lab
Sheetal.Pandey   8/13/2013 2:02:30 PM
NO RATINGS
With so many people around the world activ on Facebook, keeping huge amount of data and everything for free. FB has to find unique and economical ways to store this much data. They need customized solution.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: Cert Lab
rick merritt   8/13/2013 6:08:21 PM
NO RATINGS
@Sheetal: Indeed they do need and want some custom storage solutions. Stay tuned for a story probably tomorrow on their call for a new kind of flash memory.

LarryM99
User Rank
Author
Re: Cert Lab
LarryM99   8/13/2013 6:49:31 PM
NO RATINGS
We went from vertically integrated computer companies to distributed PC production based on interchangeable parts. It looks like we are moving into the next stage, where we have vertically integrated customer solutions for a few select companies. Where does that leave the rest of us?

Sheetal.Pandey
User Rank
Author
Re: Cert Lab
Sheetal.Pandey   8/14/2013 2:55:41 AM
NO RATINGS
Customized solutions only for few companies..because they are able to show the money and social involement or public shares. Actually giant social networking sites like Facebook needs customized storage solutions, not that other sectors dont need. I am sure its all in the money power and people power.

goafrit
User Rank
Author
Re: Cert Lab
goafrit   8/14/2013 10:52:28 AM
NO RATINGS
>> FB has to find unique and economical ways to store this much data. They need customized solution.

This has gone beyond Facebook to other firms. The data deludge is causing a lot of problems in the industry. Everyone wants to find a way to manage storage as they keep promining you can store anything for free. The business model is one of open things as from Yahoo to Google, no one is providing any limitation on how much you can store free. Dropbox main competitor will be one that will do all that is doing today free without any need for payment. 

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: Cert Lab
rick merritt   8/14/2013 11:52:13 AM
NO RATINGS
@Larry: The big data center are definitely among the big drivers of directions in infrastructure gear design and technology these days. That coulod open up a gulf between their needs and those of the enterprise -- both of which vendors need to serve.

DMcCunney
User Rank
Author
Re: Cert Lab
DMcCunney   8/14/2013 12:47:40 PM
NO RATINGS
Where does that leave the rest of us?

In a better place than we were.  The sort of engineering innovations developed for things like this tend to filter down.

Facebook has been agressively open sourcing data center design.  See http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1259185  Google and Microsoft have also been active in publishing specs.

I don't expect the technology chosen to be proprietary to FB, and do expect to see the concepts embodied in gear for smaller data centers.

 

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed